From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51294C5CFEB for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161AC20852 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:32:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 161AC20852 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387981AbeGKNgX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:36:23 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:40149 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732721AbeGKNgX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:36:23 -0400 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fdFDp-0000ku-PW; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:31:57 +0200 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:31:57 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] arm64: fpsimd: use a local_lock() in addition to local_bh_disable() Message-ID: <20180711133157.bvrza5vmthu6lwjd@linutronix.de> References: <20180517124006.ohygrrpg7z2moqqt@linutronix.de> <20180522131004.3012953c@gandalf.local.home> <20180522172115.fpqguqlsq6bavtxy@linutronix.de> <20180522132429.6f1dcf92@gandalf.local.home> <20180522173333.aawadhkcekzvrswp@linutronix.de> <20180711092555.268adf7f@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180711092555.268adf7f@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180622 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018-07-11 09:25:55 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote: > Did you decide to create a local_lock_bh(lock) function? I don't see it. > > And should this be backported to 4.14-rt too? You state you saw this in > 4.16-rt, but did you start doing something different then, or did the > kernel change? I wanted to re-evaluate the whole situation here but didn't get to it yet. > Thanks! > > -- Steve Sebastian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bigeasy@linutronix.de (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:31:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH RT] arm64: fpsimd: use a local_lock() in addition to local_bh_disable() In-Reply-To: <20180711092555.268adf7f@gandalf.local.home> References: <20180517124006.ohygrrpg7z2moqqt@linutronix.de> <20180522131004.3012953c@gandalf.local.home> <20180522172115.fpqguqlsq6bavtxy@linutronix.de> <20180522132429.6f1dcf92@gandalf.local.home> <20180522173333.aawadhkcekzvrswp@linutronix.de> <20180711092555.268adf7f@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: <20180711133157.bvrza5vmthu6lwjd@linutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2018-07-11 09:25:55 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote: > Did you decide to create a local_lock_bh(lock) function? I don't see it. > > And should this be backported to 4.14-rt too? You state you saw this in > 4.16-rt, but did you start doing something different then, or did the > kernel change? I wanted to re-evaluate the whole situation here but didn't get to it yet. > Thanks! > > -- Steve Sebastian