From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,FSL_HELO_FAKE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5A7ECDFB1 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A0320875 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="S9r7y1kH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 37A0320875 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729924AbeGMNso (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:48:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:43201 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729628AbeGMNsn (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:48:43 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id b15-v6so25188784wrv.10; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:34:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0hm7Lbjf7JCwsRCsIm1qeBxf1xRhgj3Q2/MVZ6NA+bg=; b=S9r7y1kHZAYUfd3KQO0h3goUvSQLC+t4RufftkII57uvp443jaoMx7jCombJqnPcpM o9qyK8zBjLRXbmNBN4oxZvJ6bCrOlVvqYxnI6uZ/+rM/RucC8pTyJFb2byKdQFhfPyuE nYcWlfFvLlPosY9nM6/Nndslk7UbaBrQEaoGqa20IMZ3lOZv8Fpm6YMqZAWWBMVthaa+ cVsp8mXHKeAQOHf1IGZK7O0hLhd7cZjlkKT8gEXy2DScfOfbXJs45HpUbrvEnhOPzjN4 HedlxSQDEvu3f6VrffV7Cp5vMXa6cr6caGZ0SvuD5wdgbHIditQXHLHmRndxZ459OYK+ 0kyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0hm7Lbjf7JCwsRCsIm1qeBxf1xRhgj3Q2/MVZ6NA+bg=; b=fJTBpSm9C27QXHSNnNks2VzKkAsBFXB8fxEYN9EF9kCwrxJshRZcakjnic8N1EPyZz wFdqhCGUzeyFY0ppd6mYrHwSLqh67VPPNjDYVpZX2TwUAxDYvgxq80eI3OSi9YDard2c tU1WS+WXWLxLHJOC2UwKQ1dITyQgZwR6nJHBav/IWD5aPo/PONCzp+t4dLEAvV9TuAIP JFZz4K/cULo6hl5Y6Li/poKKcOQGtNDSteQDBAQ++q4GL5j5npm4Prp7NRe3vI+GuHSA INfEl8ISeXOyv59BL1BE8cq0nfnRdBrvhJZ6rWHlhq2HSKGCM6L7CqnAm/iXaWp/+T/B fXzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEOerfN4zxtX5/GnqrQZ72fn9Lx38yP6PM4vVW8tfTyLLFokiex Ht4w+GI9urWHXV7eU/qPmm4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeCgJ9lm6L40GU/6oZ0tjViqkZw1XrylgdhWxFXqzLhvNqzicO052bJtjuo8br45dhfBG1GPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4701:: with SMTP id y1-v6mr4915096wrq.107.1531488841433; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1-v6sm9229199wma.23.2018.07.13.06.33.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 15:33:58 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Pavel Machek Cc: Yu-cheng Yu , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET Message-ID: <20180713133357.GB13602@gmail.com> References: <20180710222639.8241-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180710222639.8241-26-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180711102035.GB8574@gmail.com> <1531323638.13297.24.camel@intel.com> <20180712140327.GA7810@gmail.com> <20180713062804.GA6905@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180713062804.GA6905@amd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"), > > > > not to CFE? > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if I can change that, will find out. > > > > So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal > > names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET > > if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference. > > > > Or something like that. > > Actually, I don't think CFT is much better -- there's limited number > of TLAs (*). "ENFORCE_FLOW"? "FLOWE"? "EFLOW"? Erm, I wanted to say 'CFE', i.e. the abbreviation of 'Control Flow Enforcement'. But I guess I can live with CET as well ... Thanks, Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,FSL_HELO_FAKE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4CA7D072 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729765AbeGMNsn (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:48:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:43201 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729628AbeGMNsn (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:48:43 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id b15-v6so25188784wrv.10; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:34:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0hm7Lbjf7JCwsRCsIm1qeBxf1xRhgj3Q2/MVZ6NA+bg=; b=S9r7y1kHZAYUfd3KQO0h3goUvSQLC+t4RufftkII57uvp443jaoMx7jCombJqnPcpM o9qyK8zBjLRXbmNBN4oxZvJ6bCrOlVvqYxnI6uZ/+rM/RucC8pTyJFb2byKdQFhfPyuE nYcWlfFvLlPosY9nM6/Nndslk7UbaBrQEaoGqa20IMZ3lOZv8Fpm6YMqZAWWBMVthaa+ cVsp8mXHKeAQOHf1IGZK7O0hLhd7cZjlkKT8gEXy2DScfOfbXJs45HpUbrvEnhOPzjN4 HedlxSQDEvu3f6VrffV7Cp5vMXa6cr6caGZ0SvuD5wdgbHIditQXHLHmRndxZ459OYK+ 0kyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0hm7Lbjf7JCwsRCsIm1qeBxf1xRhgj3Q2/MVZ6NA+bg=; b=fJTBpSm9C27QXHSNnNks2VzKkAsBFXB8fxEYN9EF9kCwrxJshRZcakjnic8N1EPyZz wFdqhCGUzeyFY0ppd6mYrHwSLqh67VPPNjDYVpZX2TwUAxDYvgxq80eI3OSi9YDard2c tU1WS+WXWLxLHJOC2UwKQ1dITyQgZwR6nJHBav/IWD5aPo/PONCzp+t4dLEAvV9TuAIP JFZz4K/cULo6hl5Y6Li/poKKcOQGtNDSteQDBAQ++q4GL5j5npm4Prp7NRe3vI+GuHSA INfEl8ISeXOyv59BL1BE8cq0nfnRdBrvhJZ6rWHlhq2HSKGCM6L7CqnAm/iXaWp/+T/B fXzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEOerfN4zxtX5/GnqrQZ72fn9Lx38yP6PM4vVW8tfTyLLFokiex Ht4w+GI9urWHXV7eU/qPmm4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeCgJ9lm6L40GU/6oZ0tjViqkZw1XrylgdhWxFXqzLhvNqzicO052bJtjuo8br45dhfBG1GPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4701:: with SMTP id y1-v6mr4915096wrq.107.1531488841433; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1-v6sm9229199wma.23.2018.07.13.06.33.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 15:33:58 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Pavel Machek Cc: Yu-cheng Yu , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET Message-ID: <20180713133357.GB13602@gmail.com> References: <20180710222639.8241-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180710222639.8241-26-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180711102035.GB8574@gmail.com> <1531323638.13297.24.camel@intel.com> <20180712140327.GA7810@gmail.com> <20180713062804.GA6905@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180713062804.GA6905@amd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org * Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"), > > > > not to CFE? > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if I can change that, will find out. > > > > So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal > > names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET > > if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference. > > > > Or something like that. > > Actually, I don't think CFT is much better -- there's limited number > of TLAs (*). "ENFORCE_FLOW"? "FLOWE"? "EFLOW"? Erm, I wanted to say 'CFE', i.e. the abbreviation of 'Control Flow Enforcement'. But I guess I can live with CET as well ... Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 15:33:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20180713133357.GB13602@gmail.com> References: <20180710222639.8241-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180710222639.8241-26-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180711102035.GB8574@gmail.com> <1531323638.13297.24.camel@intel.com> <20180712140327.GA7810@gmail.com> <20180713062804.GA6905@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180713062804.GA6905@amd> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Yu-cheng Yu , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org * Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"), > > > > not to CFE? > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if I can change that, will find out. > > > > So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal > > names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET > > if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference. > > > > Or something like that. > > Actually, I don't think CFT is much better -- there's limited number > of TLAs (*). "ENFORCE_FLOW"? "FLOWE"? "EFLOW"? Erm, I wanted to say 'CFE', i.e. the abbreviation of 'Control Flow Enforcement'. But I guess I can live with CET as well ... Thanks, Ingo