From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:35:26 +0900
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/17] fs: fat: extend FAT write operations
In-Reply-To: <fa0b09c5-7b6c-b58d-7114-c5b52036e412@gmx.de>
References: <20180720025723.6736-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
 <bbbff7c2-2bf6-db8c-f041-aa5a5c4054bf@gmx.de>
 <fa0b09c5-7b6c-b58d-7114-c5b52036e412@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20180723073525.GP11258@linaro.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 08:44:39AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Hello Tom, hello Alex,
> 
> I have been testing the patches. They are working fine for ASCII file
> names. To support Unicode file names extra work will be needed. But
> probably we should postpone this to a later patch series.

I absolutely agree.
To be clear, the aim of my FAT write patchset is to successfully run
SCT to evaluate and verify UEFI-related features rather than to make
the implementation comply with UEFI specification.

For the latter purpose, separate patches would be compiled as it might
require time-consuming efforts.
(I'm sure that SCT's file (media access) protocol test causes lots of
test case failures.)

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

> There are some dependencies with my work for correcting errors in
> Unicode handling for the EFI branch. Should the patches be passed via
> efi-next?
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Heinrich