[PATCH v2 0/4] fail compilation with strcpy

[Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 04:32:59PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> This is a patch series to address the discussion in the thread at:
> 
>   https://public-inbox.org/git/20180713204350.GA16999@sigill.intra.peff.net/
> 
> Basically, the question was: can we declare strcpy banned and have a
> linter save us the trouble of finding it in review. The answer is yes,
> the compiler is good at that. ;)

Here's a v2 that I think addresses the comments on the earlier series.
Thanks everybody for your review.

Changes here include:

 - drop the mention in CodingGuidelines. That list is already long, and
   we don't need to to waste mental effort on things that will be
   enforced automatically

 - we now #undef all macros before defining them to avoid redefinition
   warnings

 - the first patch now covers _just_ strcpy(), and each function gets
   its own patch with an explanation (and suggested alternatives). My
   thought is that these should be easy to dig up via blame, "log -S",
   or "log --grep". Though another option would be comments in banned.h.

 - added strcat and vsprintf to the banned list

 - tweaked the first patch's commit message for clarity and to address
   points raised in discussion

As before, this needs to go on top of 022d2ac1f3 (which I hope should
hit master soon anyway).

  [1/4]: automatically ban strcpy()
  [2/4]: banned.h: mark strcat() as banned
  [3/4]: banned.h: mark sprintf() as banned
  [4/4]: banned.h: mark strncpy() as banned

 banned.h          | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 git-compat-util.h |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 banned.h

-Peff