All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, billodo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:28:55 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180726232855.GD2234@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153262651940.8934.17525988748289196893.stgit@magnolia>

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:35:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
> 
> Current sb verifier doesn't check bounds on sb_fdblocks and sb_ifree.
> Add sanity checks for these parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
> [darrick: remove the icount check, tweak the comments a little]
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index b3ad15956366..b2c683588519 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -599,22 +599,16 @@ xfs_sb_to_disk(
>  static int
>  xfs_sb_verify(
>  	struct xfs_buf	*bp,
> +	struct xfs_sb	*sb,
>  	bool		check_version)
>  {
>  	struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> -	struct xfs_sb	sb;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk 
> -	 * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
> -	 */
> -	__xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Only check the in progress field for the primary superblock as
>  	 * mkfs.xfs doesn't clear it from secondary superblocks.
>  	 */
> -	return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, &sb,
> +	return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, sb,
>  				     bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn == XFS_SB_DADDR,
>  				     check_version);

Why do we need to keep this wrapper function? The in-progress check
is a primary superblock read verifier check (only useful at mount
time), as is the "check_version" flag used to validate the V5
feature mask during mount.

i.e. xfs_sb_verify() needs to go away, and the read-side only checks
need to be moved from xfs_mount_validate_sb() into
xfs_sb_read_verify() too. At which point, xfs_mount_validate_sb()
has nothing to do with mount and can be renamed to
xfs_sb_verify_common()....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-27  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-26 17:35 [PATCH 1/2] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 17:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: verify icount in superblock write Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 17:48   ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-26 23:20   ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-27  0:07     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-27 10:44       ` Brian Foster
2018-07-27 14:30         ` Eric Sandeen
2018-07-27 22:13         ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-29  4:39         ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-30 12:36           ` Brian Foster
2018-07-26 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-26 23:28 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-07-27 15:05   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180726232855.GD2234@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=billodo@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.