On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 17:58:54 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 27.07.2018 um 17:07 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> > On 07/27/2018 09:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Like for query-block, the client needs to identify which BlockBackend
> > > the returned data is for. Anonymous BlockBackends are identified by the
> > > device model they are attached to. Add a 'qdev' field that contains the
> > > qdev ID or QOM path of the attached device model.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > > @@ -879,7 +882,7 @@
> > >   # Since: 0.14.0
> > >   ##
> > >   { 'struct': 'BlockStats',
> > > -  'data': {'*device': 'str', '*node-name': 'str',
> > > +  'data': {'*device': 'str', '*qdev': 'str', '*node-name': 'str',
> > >              'stats': 'BlockDeviceStats',
> > >              '*parent': 'BlockStats',
> > >              '*backing': 'BlockStats'} }
> > 
> > Can we also update the example under query-blockstats a few lines later to
> > show the added field?
> 
> I'll add the qdev field, but the example is hopelessly outdated anyway.
> Sounds like something for another patch.

When doing further cleanups it would be worth also noting that the
'query-nodes' argument of 'query-blockstats' does not return correct
information.

Right now it creates a false impression that it just changes the output
from nested to linear and includes filter nodes, but in fact the data is
not correct in that mode.