From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] xsk: improvements to RX queue check and replace Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:48:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20180731.094846.1188284010173856034.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180731034353.3774-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> <60ce1aab-5a6f-8d9c-e3d0-cc79fb15953d@iogearbox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com, bjorn.topel@intel.com To: daniel@iogearbox.net Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:54440 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728042AbeGaS35 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:29:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <60ce1aab-5a6f-8d9c-e3d0-cc79fb15953d@iogearbox.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:50:12 +0200 > On 07/31/2018 05:43 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> Hi! >> >> First 3 patches of my recent RFC. The first one make the check against >> real_num_rx_queues slightly more reliable, while the latter two redefine >> XDP_QUERY_XSK_UMEM slightly to disallow replacing UMEM in the driver at >> the stack level. >> >> I'm not sure where this lays on the bpf vs net trees scale, but there >> should be no conflicts with either tree. > > I'm fine either way, in any case, series looks good to me: > > Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Series applied to net-next then :)