From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A0578DC4 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:07:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Jul 2018 05:07:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,427,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="250457475" Received: from mbabyjoh-desk.fi.intel.com (HELO mbabyjoh-desk.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.237.72.84]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2018 05:07:37 -0700 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 15:08:58 +0300 From: "Maxin B. John" To: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org Message-ID: <20180731120857.GA27638@mbabyjoh-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1533034411-26881-1-git-send-email-maxin.john@intel.com> <1533034411-26881-2-git-send-email-maxin.john@intel.com> <02c7f3287776cfa47e68579454e5abb42d8c0e9d.camel@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <02c7f3287776cfa47e68579454e5abb42d8c0e9d.camel@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vulkan-demos: upgrade to latest commit X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:07:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi RP, On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 01:01:31PM +0100, richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 12:17 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 31 July 2018 at 11:53, Maxin B. John wrote: > > > Update subcomponents gli and glm based on the new structure of > > > repository. > > > > If they're submodules then the gitsm: fetcher should get those for > > you. > > The gitsm fetcher is broken from an archive/mirroring persective iirc > though. Using it in OE-Core by default is therefore potentially > problematic :(. Thanks for looking into this. Saw similar comments for this change (old one): https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/85413/ > Cheers, > > Richard Best Regards, Maxin