All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:26:25 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180815092625.1ab4109d@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180806144736.4fbe1e51@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1953 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:47:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/Kconfig
>   arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   1572497cb0e6 ("kconfig: include common Kconfig files from top-level Kconfig")
> 
> from the kbuild tree and commits:
> 
>   78ae2e1cd845 ("arm64: Use the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER")
>   c5ca4560de0f ("openrisc: Use the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index a3de6ad666d4,3d1011957823..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@@ -278,9 -265,10 +279,6 @@@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBE
>   config ARCH_PROC_KCORE_TEXT
>   	def_bool y
>   
> - config MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> - 	def_bool y
>  -source "init/Kconfig"
>  -
>  -source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
> --
>   source "arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms"
>   
>   menu "Bus support"
> diff --cc arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> index fee9d91a66e6,dfb6a79ba7ff..000000000000
> --- a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> @@@ -71,9 -69,10 +71,6 @@@ config STACKTRACE_SUPPOR
>   config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
>   	def_bool  y
>   
> - config MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> - 	def_bool y
>  -source "init/Kconfig"
>  -
>  -source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
> --
>   menu "Processor type and features"
>   
>   choice

This is now a conflict between Linus' tree and the kbuild tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-14 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-06  4:47 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-14 23:26 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-17  1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-23  4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-23  5:37 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-05-23  5:46   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-23  5:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-23 16:23   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-05-27  2:19     ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-05-27  4:47       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-05-27  6:04         ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-05-27 12:18           ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-05-27 14:59           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-09-25  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-15  1:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-26  2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-20  4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-23  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-03  1:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-06  3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-18  3:35 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-18  6:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-07  5:10 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-07 19:25 ` Michal Marek
2012-05-07 20:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-05-20  3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-20  3:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-07-01  4:05 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180815092625.1ab4109d@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.