Hi all,

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:49:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   16e98cec49a4 ("ipvs: don't show negative times in ip_vs_conn")
> 
> from the netfilter tree and commit:
> 
>   ec1b28ca9674 ("ipvs: provide just conn to ip_vs_state_name")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> index 615286dcf4c0,0edc62910ebf..000000000000
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> @@@ -1107,10 -1122,8 +1122,10 @@@ static int ip_vs_conn_seq_show(struct s
>   				&cp->caddr.in6, ntohs(cp->cport),
>   				&cp->vaddr.in6, ntohs(cp->vport),
>   				dbuf, ntohs(cp->dport),
> - 				ip_vs_state_name(cp->protocol, cp->state),
> + 				ip_vs_state_name(cp),
>  -				(cp->timer.expires-jiffies)/HZ, pe_data);
>  +				jiffies_delta_to_msecs(cp->timer.expires -
>  +						       jiffies) / 1000,
>  +				pe_data);
>   		else
>   #endif
>   			seq_printf(seq,
> @@@ -1120,10 -1133,8 +1135,10 @@@
>   				ntohl(cp->caddr.ip), ntohs(cp->cport),
>   				ntohl(cp->vaddr.ip), ntohs(cp->vport),
>   				dbuf, ntohs(cp->dport),
> - 				ip_vs_state_name(cp->protocol, cp->state),
> + 				ip_vs_state_name(cp),
>  -				(cp->timer.expires-jiffies)/HZ, pe_data);
>  +				jiffies_delta_to_msecs(cp->timer.expires -
>  +						       jiffies) / 1000,
>  +				pe_data);
>   	}
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@@ -1173,10 -1184,9 +1188,10 @@@ static int ip_vs_conn_sync_seq_show(str
>   				&cp->caddr.in6, ntohs(cp->cport),
>   				&cp->vaddr.in6, ntohs(cp->vport),
>   				dbuf, ntohs(cp->dport),
> - 				ip_vs_state_name(cp->protocol, cp->state),
> + 				ip_vs_state_name(cp),
>   				ip_vs_origin_name(cp->flags),
>  -				(cp->timer.expires-jiffies)/HZ);
>  +				jiffies_delta_to_msecs(cp->timer.expires -
>  +						       jiffies) / 1000);
>   		else
>   #endif
>   			seq_printf(seq,
> @@@ -1186,10 -1196,9 +1201,10 @@@
>   				ntohl(cp->caddr.ip), ntohs(cp->cport),
>   				ntohl(cp->vaddr.ip), ntohs(cp->vport),
>   				dbuf, ntohs(cp->dport),
> - 				ip_vs_state_name(cp->protocol, cp->state),
> + 				ip_vs_state_name(cp),
>   				ip_vs_origin_name(cp->flags),
>  -				(cp->timer.expires-jiffies)/HZ);
>  +				jiffies_delta_to_msecs(cp->timer.expires -
>  +						       jiffies) / 1000);
>   	}
>   	return 0;
>   }

This is now a conflict between Linus' tree and the netfilter tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell