All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Hari Vyas <hari.vyas@broadcom.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ray.jui@broadcom.com,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: PCIe enable device races (Was: [PATCH v3] PCI: Data corruption happening due to race condition)
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:28:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180816122807.6xof2u3hbhv57ua5@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3316c91ad722434360b4018b17cbfe265e97801.camel@kernel.crashing.org>

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 07:52:06AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I would also like to use this rather than the bitmap atomics for is_added
> etc... (Hari's fix) in the long run. Atomics aren't significantly cheaper
> and imho makes thing even messier.

PCI device enablement isn't a hotpath, so the performance saving of
acquire/release memory barriers vs. full memory barriers is hardly
a strong argument.

Atomic bitops have the advantage of being usable in atomic context,
unlike a struct mutex.  And they don't require any spinning if the
variable is accessed concurrently.

Last not least an atomic bitop needs just 1 line of code versus 3 lines
of code to acquire a lock, update the variable and release the lock.
"Elegance is not optional."

That said, the race *you're* dealing with appears to be distinct from
Hari's in that a lock is unavoidable because (AFAIUI) atomic_inc_return()
is called before enablement actually happens, yet both needs to happen
atomically.

Thanks,

Lukas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-16 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-03  9:05 [PATCH v3] PCI: Data corruption happening due to race condition Hari Vyas
2018-07-03  9:05 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-03  9:13   ` Lukas Wunner
2018-07-18 23:29   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-19  4:18     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-07-19 14:04       ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-19 18:55         ` Lukas Wunner
2018-07-20  4:27           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-07-27 22:25       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-28  0:45         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-07-31 11:21         ` Michael Ellerman
2018-07-19 17:41   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-20  9:16     ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-20 12:20       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-31 16:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-15  3:35   ` PCIe enable device races (Was: [PATCH v3] PCI: Data corruption happening due to race condition) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-15  4:16     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-15  4:44       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-15  5:21         ` [RFC PATCH] pci: Proof of concept at fixing pci_enable_device/bridge races Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-15 19:09         ` PCIe enable device races (Was: [PATCH v3] PCI: Data corruption happening due to race condition) Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-15 21:50         ` [RFC PATCH] pci: Proof of concept at fixing pci_enable_device/bridge races Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-15 22:40           ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-15 23:38             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20  1:31               ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-17  3:07           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-17  3:42             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-15 18:50     ` PCIe enable device races (Was: [PATCH v3] PCI: Data corruption happening due to race condition) Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-15 21:52       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-15 23:23         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16  7:58         ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2018-08-16  8:02           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16  9:22             ` Hari Vyas
2018-08-16 10:10               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 10:11                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 10:26                 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-08-16 10:47                   ` Hari Vyas
2018-08-16 23:20                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 23:17                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-17  0:43                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 19:43             ` Jens Axboe
2018-08-16 21:37               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 21:56                 ` Jens Axboe
2018-08-16 23:09                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-17  0:14                     ` Jens Axboe
2018-08-16 12:28         ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2018-08-16 23:25           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-17  1:12             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-17 16:39               ` Lukas Wunner
2018-08-18  3:37                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-18  9:22                   ` Lukas Wunner
2018-08-18 13:11                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180816122807.6xof2u3hbhv57ua5@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hari.vyas@broadcom.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.jui@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.