From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=TO5I=LL=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C00C433F4
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:18:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17672083C
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:18:50 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MIKpHPOC"
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B17672083C
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728212AbeH1SKl (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:10:41 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48204 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1727094AbeH1SKk (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:10:40 -0400
Received: from jouet.infradead.org (unknown [190.15.121.82])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11CC62083C;
        Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:18:46 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=default; t=1535465926;
        bh=fLmMXCKWPSVuWYRdQVCAePuambqOfFjwDD7GWq0wo2U=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
        b=MIKpHPOCp61tWRwbGTg2ZtSv0FgSt6BLPbpU8laK8xneHVV7gJEEFiuiDOg9r8MO0
         hm3Hmw0v57PDZfJ3pWmF8vYAgGlso0VxyVTEvec8RaDRbDrR1tDkqOPVc9P0BvkaGu
         Mqhh5XRAvXbbDPKgJZCgHLYVs7Z9ChULpogBmU4I=
Received: by jouet.infradead.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 61D43141C3F; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:18:43 -0300 (-03)
Date:   Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:18:43 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To:     Martin =?utf-8?B?TGnFoWth?= <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc:     linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Properly interpret indirect call in perf annotate.
Message-ID: <20180828141843.GH22309@kernel.org>
References: <bd1f3932-be2b-85f9-7582-111ee0a43b07@suse.cz>
 <20180823141219.GA4766@kernel.org>
 <64684c59-492c-3310-a5d2-14b467602acc@suse.cz>
 <20180828141047.GG22309@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20180828141047.GG22309@kernel.org>
X-Url:  http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:10:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > On 08/23/2018 04:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > >> The patch changes interpretation of:
> > >> callq  *0x8(%rbx)
> > >>
> > >> from:
> > >>   0.26 │     → callq  *8
> > >> to:
> > >>   0.26 │     → callq  *0x8(%rbx)

<SNIP>

> > > Please mention one or two functions where such sequence appears, so that
> > > others can reproduce your before/after more quickly,

> > Sure, there's self-contained example on can compile (-O2) and test.
> > It's following call in test function:

> > test:
> > .LFB1:
> >         .cfi_startproc
> >         movq    %rdi, %rax
> >         subq    $8, %rsp
> >         .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> >         movq    %rsi, %rdi
> >         movq    %rdx, %rsi
> >         call    *8(%rax) <---- here
> >         cmpl    $1, %eax
> >         adcl    $-1, %eax
> >         addq    $8, %rsp
> >         .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
> >         ret
> >         .cfi_endproc
> 
> Here I'm getting:
> 
> Samples: 2K of event 'cycles:uppp', 4000 Hz, Event count (approx.): 1808551484
> test  /home/acme/c/perf-callq [Percent: local period]
>   0.17 │      mov    %rdx,-0x28(%rbp)
>   0.58 │      mov    -0x18(%rbp),%rax
>   7.90 │      mov    0x8(%rax),%rax
>   8.67 │      mov    -0x28(%rbp),%rcx
>        │      mov    -0x20(%rbp),%rdx
>   0.08 │      mov    %rcx,%rsi
>   6.28 │      mov    %rdx,%rdi
>  10.50 │    → callq  *%rax
>   1.67 │      mov    %eax,-0x4(%rbp)
>  11.95 │      cmpl   $0x0,-0x4(%rbp)
>   8.14 │    ↓ je     3d
>        │      mov    -0x4(%rbp),%eax
>        │      sub    $0x1,%eax
>        │    ↓ jmp    42
>        │3d:   mov    $0x0,%eax
>   7.84 │42:   leaveq
>        │    ← retq
> 
> Without the patch, will check if something changes with it.

No changes with the patch, but then I did another test, ran a system
wide record for a while, then tested without/with your patch, with
--stdio2 redirecting to /tmp/{before,after} and got the expected
results, see below.

Thanks, applying,

- Arnaldo

--- /tmp/before 2018-08-28 11:16:03.238384143 -0300
+++ /tmp/after  2018-08-28 11:15:39.335341042 -0300
@@ -13274,7 +13274,7 @@
              ↓ jle    128     
                hash_value = hash_table->hash_func (key);
                mov    0x8(%rsp),%rdi
-  0.91       → callq  *30     
+  0.91       → callq  *0x30(%r12)
                mov    $0x2,%r8d
                cmp    $0x2,%eax
                node_hash = hash_table->hashes[node_index];
@@ -13848,7 +13848,7 @@
                 mov    %r14,%rdi
                 sub    %rbx,%r13
                 mov    %r13,%rdx
-              → callq  *38      
+              → callq  *0x38(%r15)
                 cmp    %rax,%r13
   1.91        ↓ je     240      
          1b4:   mov    $0xffffffff,%r13d
@@ -14026,7 +14026,7 @@
                 mov    %rcx,-0x500(%rbp)
                 mov    %r15,%rsi
                 mov    %r14,%rdi
-              → callq  *38      
+              → callq  *0x38(%rax)
                 mov    -0x500(%rbp),%rcx
                 cmp    %rax,%rcx
               ↓ jne    9b0
<SNIP tons of other such cases>