From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mbuf: add IGMP packet type
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:10:27 +0530
Message-ID: <20180829164026.GA13511@jerin>
References: <20180827123835.27531-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
 <20180829083110.42d85024@xeon-e3> <20180829155904.GA7133@jerin>
 <20180829093436.3f06421f@xeon-e3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-dm3nam03on0067.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.41.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCD0F11
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:40:46 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180829093436.3f06421f@xeon-e3>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:34:36 -0700
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev]  [PATCH] mbuf: add IGMP packet type
> 
> External Email
> 
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:29:05 +0530
> Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:31:10 -0700
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > > To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev]  [PATCH] mbuf: add IGMP packet type
> > >
> > > External Email
> > >
> > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:08:35 +0530
> > > Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Add support for IGMP packet type.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > >
> > > Could you add logic to recoginize IGMP to the software packet type identification
> > > rte_net_get_ptype used by drivers that don't have hardware support.
> >
> > If everyone agrees then I can do it as adding IGMP support will reduce
> > the performance of rte_net_get_ptype() and most of the NIC may not need it.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > >
> > > Also shouldn't this bit be part of RTE_PTYPE_L4_MASK?
> >
> > The RTE_PTYPE_L4_MASK is 0x00000f00 so it is part it. Right?
> 
> Then you must add it to the software matcher since most drivers are advertising L4_MASK

Which driver returns .dev_supported_ptypes_get ethdev ops with L4_MASK?

>