From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-path: Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:46377 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728972AbeH3SnG (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:43:06 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id b129-v6so3973985pga.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:40:36 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Marek Behun Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, wim@linux-watchdog.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: Add support for Armada 37xx CPU watchdog Message-ID: <20180830144036.GA24117@roeck-us.net> References: <20180830142243.12153-1-marek.behun@nic.cz> <20180830162828.356ca519@nic.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180830162828.356ca519@nic.cz> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 04:28:28PM +0200, Marek Behun wrote: > Hi, > > Checkpatch complains about not adding the new .c file to MAINTAINERS. > As I am sending other patches to linux-gpio, which creates a new group > in MAINTAINERS file, to which this file should belong, but if I created > this group also here, it would result in a conflict. > The addition of this file to MAINTAINERS will be done in the patch sent > to linux-gpio. Is this ok, or shall I do it differently? > Thanks. > This is one of the checkpatch complains to ignore. Guenter