Re: [PATCH v1 12/13] ethdev: process declarative eth devargs

["Gaëtan Rivet" <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 01:10:48PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 08/30/2018 04:42 PM, Gaetan Rivet wrote:
> > Process the class-specific arguments in a devargs.
> > This processing takes the form of setting the proper eth_dev fields when
> > relevant.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
> > ---
> >   lib/librte_ethdev/eth_private.h   |  5 +++
> >   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_class_eth.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c    |  7 ++++
> >   3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/eth_private.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/eth_private.h
> > index 0f5c6d5c4..c0c065165 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/eth_private.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/eth_private.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
> >   eth_find_device(const struct rte_eth_dev *_start, rte_eth_cmp_t cmp,
> >   		const void *data);
> > +/* Generic rte_eth_dev parameters processor. */
> > +int
> > +rte_eth_dev_args_parse(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
> > +		       struct rte_devargs *da);
> > +
> >   #ifdef __cplusplus
> >   }
> >   #endif
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_class_eth.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_class_eth.c
> > index d8d8e8845..18fdef605 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_class_eth.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_class_eth.c
> 
> <...>
> 
> > @@ -79,6 +93,54 @@ eth_dev_iterate(const void *start,
> >   	return edev;
> >   }
> > +static int
> > +eth_dev_set_name(struct rte_eth_dev *edev,
> > +		 const char *value)
> > +{
> > +	snprintf(edev->data->name,
> > +		 sizeof(edev->data->name),
> > +		 "%s", value);
> 
> strlcpy()?

Ok.

> Shouldn't we return error if name does fit in name buffer?

Good idea.

> 
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +ethdev_args_process(const char *key,
> > +		    const char *value,
> > +		    void *_edev)
> > +{
> > +	static eth_dev_set_t eth_dev_set[] = {
> > +		[RTE_ETH_PARAMS_NAME] = eth_dev_set_name,
> > +		[RTE_ETH_PARAMS_MAX] = NULL,
> > +	};
> > +	struct rte_eth_dev *edev = _edev;
> > +	int param;
> > +
> > +	param = ethdev_param_id(key);
> > +	if (eth_dev_set[param])
> > +		return eth_dev_set[param](edev, value);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +rte_eth_dev_args_parse(struct rte_eth_dev *edev,
> > +		       struct rte_devargs *devargs)
> > +{
> > +	struct rte_kvargs *kvargs = NULL;
> > +
> > +	if (devargs == NULL || devargs->cls_str == NULL)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	kvargs = rte_kvargs_parse_delim(devargs->cls_str, eth_params_keys, "/");
> > +	if (kvargs == NULL) {
> > +		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "cannot parse argument list\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +	if (rte_kvargs_process(kvargs, NULL, ethdev_args_process, edev))
> 
> Shouldn't we free kvargs here as well?
> 

Indeed, silly mistake.
Thanks

> > +		return -1;
> > +	rte_kvargs_free(kvargs);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   struct rte_class rte_class_eth = {
> >   	.dev_iterate = eth_dev_iterate,
> >   };
> 
> <...>

-- 
Gaëtan Rivet
6WIND