From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7343BC433F5 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 20:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EE0205F4 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 20:50:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 32EE0205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=techadventures.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727699AbeIAA7z (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2018 20:59:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:37538 "EHLO mail-wr1-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727212AbeIAA7z (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2018 20:59:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id u12-v6so12311007wrr.4 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:50:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=+SVi80wrbbngLcx6Bsj63I2xnjD8Ms9n+e/3Og5oNRk=; b=iSyiGWf+3PZWEBqodfvpyGlA+lWHT2j/r9Og3iUdRcT6sTYwAe+V7b77iKJ7mnvha+ ahUKbPrQ6ge+4rrrAQJMideKxSAUqK0QWMgOQYhvYrdRH/ElzhlQLfSiNvrBUWJKYhTY DvL6ZZ7q2Zf/scXYhCA3EXUOdF3CYN+ryGHNAwNsgN23Z/RhTxrxSleCDmA9YcnRQz2G Ela6fywbXTC4zw9/ebzwJ2ArpdT/6lxxl1CtPzUTXPFH7PfObDYtUoesLd5pL1kHb21F uMboEGW90geu2KA0WgSmH1MVrQV7ucE22CHvBc/6lf4wwuKdJifQonIRMV4nSubaZMAt gHYA== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51B5jSZ1nrkoxWmgGQUGqWUe2NOViO3VbSkP5Xeh5XQG/9PrvmVY 3bd/PCpY5m6t0GF5zpfBUstG/SP5KYyo6Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaesVc9g/j44+IV0W5p0Dh33abxwEU33j9D0lZEcgpSAWtE0CyM9rTCr8Kb20C1iK/lf18ZjQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e14f:: with SMTP id f15-v6mr11875988wri.42.1535748641700; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from techadventures.net (techadventures.net. [62.201.165.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z16-v6sm9053337wrq.78.2018.08.31.13.50.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by techadventures.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5EE4D124D4B; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 22:50:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 22:50:40 +0200 From: Oscar Salvador To: Pasha Tatashin Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mhocko@suse.com" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , "jglisse@redhat.com" , "david@redhat.com" , "jonathan.cameron@huawei.com" , "yasu.isimatu@gmail.com" , "logang@deltatee.com" , "dave.jiang@intel.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Oscar Salvador Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/2] mm/memory_hotplug: Shrink spanned pages when offlining memory Message-ID: <20180831205040.GA3945@techadventures.net> References: <20180817154127.28602-1-osalvador@techadventures.net> <20180817154127.28602-3-osalvador@techadventures.net> <348c662b-455a-1ea4-1db5-3bddcbdb4f14@microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <348c662b-455a-1ea4-1db5-3bddcbdb4f14@microsoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:09:01PM +0000, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > Hi Oscar, > > I have been studying this patch, and do not see anything bad about it > except that it begs to be split into smaller patches. I think you can > send this work as a series without RFC if this patch is split into 3 or > so patches. I will review that series. Thanks Pavel for having taken a look at this. I will split up the patch and re-send it without RFC. Thanks! -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3