On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 02:21:20PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 17:25 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Should this be integrated into the Linux trace event mechanism rather
> > than open coded?  It would at least be nice to not call this a trace
> > event buffer - when I initially read this I was expecting it to be for
> > the standard Linux stuff which obviously it isn't.

> Your right, I'll rename. The eventual aim is to make it more like Linux trace
> but we are constrained somewhat as some DSPs only 96kB or instruction RAM, hence
> it's a simple and raw trace infrastructure.

I was thinking the code could read it like it's doing now and then just
have a trace event to dump it into the core trace infrastructure as it
reads things in.