From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580A81418 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB63076D for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:45:38 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <20180911144538.3ceecd8d@vmware.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20180911170212.GC8284@roeck-us.net> References: <20180907004944.GD16300@sasha-vm> <20180907014930.GE16300@sasha-vm> <20180907145437.GF16300@sasha-vm> <20180910194310.GV16300@sasha-vm> <20180910164519.6cbcc116@vmware.local.home> <20180910212019.GA32269@roeck-us.net> <20180911111853.GB8018@sirena.org.uk> <20180911170212.GC8284@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Bug-introducing patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:02:12 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > FWIW, for the most part I stopped reporting issues with -next after some people > yelled at me for the 'noise' I was creating. Along the line of "This has been > fixed in branch xxx; why don't you do your homework and check there", with > branch xxx not even being in -next. I don't mind "this has already been > reported/fixed", quite the contrary, but the "why don't you do your homework" > got me over the edge. A bug reporter should never be yelled at. The correct response should be "Thank you for the report, but we have already fixed that bug in XYZ branch, would you mind testing that?" That's how I respond to such reports. I've been told that yelling is never appropriate (although I may not totally agree with that statement), but nasty messages to people reporting bugs to your code (regardless if it's fixed or not someplace else) is totally uncalled for. -- Steve