From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CED8C04ABB for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A8D206B8 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="UaAAT+sU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 37A8D206B8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727837AbeIKV2f (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:28:35 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f195.google.com ([209.85.219.195]:37634 "EHLO mail-yb1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726622AbeIKV2f (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:28:35 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f195.google.com with SMTP id f145-v6so9562462ybg.4; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:28:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SgKXe1P45yrdUnFpQp9xAddHz5/gmeVY6MVbuy+BCCg=; b=UaAAT+sUwXVbXb8s3DcUgxHFsLTmcuMKCetZxFlQfQUfUFDiAmO7J0GfqW6FUu9k7B fv3XTM2+4AYGWG5LRoeZ+PIG1L09WOxaaWxRUpyiRMOqUj/ZeQIUZrRko/JFshhYKDDZ iIbT2XB9mF0Z5x+NRjoc0FRq3d7z0i5t7WuSuCBcpD5r33FcJmDhL4SV8GgES/eTGV4W BFOwVdIHM+pA+8fpapPJZ6kjgGJiMe7RLZshwjLGqjUW/V3RG1ID3TnPyztwv+fQKn2X ed5XzY5KSB3dd6hupSKhQaFU0gQ+swXKnyHTFJZ6XM1ojHoIakkMbsSFAKWdd4/r+ngS +n3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SgKXe1P45yrdUnFpQp9xAddHz5/gmeVY6MVbuy+BCCg=; b=K7QHesGS38KrW/H2OhwB/9c0k8BzO1KrOyfyFbZaYn5V+XJDwahNLBNTH/B5VgFA7G 1fcVYTECVIco/vowjO7Vv9k6X49vUxHGxsjsf6tF7Y20biQusUnmNiw79b4rNIUGYXcI e+riwfUNIku+jsk+3nQq3OVHfir9DxtofhnO2FabZKQ5YWxdQEDEd0VRFQXoroF2CE+n SZixeobttbPDMwE7gxl6X0FWsd2Pvs4O8WrJBEyc2ZF4GOp82WwtBold4lmlGQuaQJDt 5gm/ebLxP3hBpB0GsjNsxbkJqBx2uTXJpvlX37YqmoQIHAEwnkGt4y3+DaT0j+Qhs/gi uGvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51A53mF339VCio4ubIkoi5epYRE5cMCZCSy49puTXx/Az2sYAHTd fYtaAJ9QIa4qRTCdivb4MJs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdafITz7InCSQo81eIukv99W/SEIG4NavXMskQRFxnOFEIJ1WRG8KmIvdp4vJsjaltE18XTSsg== X-Received: by 2002:a25:f212:: with SMTP id i18-v6mr13107392ybe.267.1536683311316; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:200::1:6304]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h63-v6sm7541562ywb.28.2018.09.11.09.28.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:28:27 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Patrick Bellasi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/16] sched/core: uclamp: propagate parent clamps Message-ID: <20180911162827.GJ1100574@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> References: <20180828135324.21976-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20180828135324.21976-9-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20180911151819.GH1100574@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> <20180911162624.GB1413@e110439-lin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180911162624.GB1413@e110439-lin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Patrick. On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 05:26:24PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > My question is: IF the scheduler maintainers are going to be happy > with the overall design for the core bits, are you happy to start the > review of the cgroups bits before the core ones are (eventually) merged? Yeah, sure, once the feature is more or less agreed on the scheduler core side, we can delve into how it should be represented in cgroup. Thanks. -- tejun