From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Kaehlcke Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] drivers: qcom: rpmh: write PDC data Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:55:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20180912225552.GM22824@google.com> References: <1532685889-31345-1-git-send-email-rplsssn@codeaurora.org> <1532685889-31345-7-git-send-email-rplsssn@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1532685889-31345-7-git-send-email-rplsssn@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Raju P L S S S N Cc: andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, evgreen@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org, ilina@codeaurora.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 03:34:49PM +0530, Raju P L S S S N wrote: > From: Lina Iyer > > In addition to requests that are send to the remote processor, the > controller may allow certain data to be written to the controller for > use in specific cases like wakeup value when entering idle states. > Allow a pass through to write PDC data. > > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer > Signed-off-by: Raju P.L.S.S.S.N > --- > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c > index 0d276fd..f81488b 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c > @@ -472,6 +472,34 @@ int rpmh_write_batch(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmh_write_batch); > > +/** > + * rpmh_write_pdc_data: Write PDC data to the controller > + * > + * @dev: the device making the request > + * @cmd: The payload data > + * @n: The number of elements in payload > + * > + * Write PDC data to the controller. The messages are always sent async. > + * > + * May be called from atomic contexts. > + */ > +int rpmh_write_pdc_data(const struct device *dev, > + const struct tcs_cmd *cmd, u32 n) > +{ > + DEFINE_RPMH_MSG_ONSTACK(dev, 0, NULL, rpm_msg); At first I was concerned about the message being created on the stack and sent asynchronously, however there is no asynchronous access to the on-stack memory after returning from rpmh_rsc_write_pdc_data(). > + struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr = get_rpmh_ctrlr(dev); > + > + if (!n || n > MAX_RPMH_PAYLOAD) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + memcpy(rpm_msg.cmd, cmd, n * sizeof(*cmd)); > + rpm_msg.msg.num_cmds = n; > + rpm_msg.msg.wait_for_compl = false; > + > + return rpmh_rsc_write_pdc_data(ctrlr_to_drv(ctrlr), &rpm_msg.msg); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmh_write_pdc_data); > + > static int is_req_valid(struct cache_req *req) > { > return (req->sleep_val != UINT_MAX && > diff --git a/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h b/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h > index 018788d..d5e736e 100644 > --- a/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h > +++ b/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h > @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ int rpmh_write_batch(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state, > > int rpmh_mode_solver_set(const struct device *dev, bool enable); > > +int rpmh_write_pdc_data(const struct device *dev, > + const struct tcs_cmd *cmd, u32 n); > + > #else > > static inline int rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state, > @@ -56,6 +59,9 @@ static inline int rpmh_ctrlr_idle(const struct device *dev) > static inline int rpmh_mode_solver_set(const struct device *dev, bool enable) > { return -ENODEV; } > > +static inline int rpmh_write_pdc_data(const struct device *dev, > + const struct tcs_cmd *cmd, u32 n) > +{ return -ENODEV; } > #endif /* CONFIG_QCOM_RPMH */ > > #endif /* __SOC_QCOM_RPMH_H__ */ Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke