From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E1A0FE006C7; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:39:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.seebs.net (mail.seebs.net [162.213.38.76]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB98FE0053F for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seebsdell (unknown [204.153.192.24]) by mail.seebs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B49A2E8922; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:39:11 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:39:09 -0500 From: Seebs To: "Burton, Ross" Message-ID: <20180919093909.12d3fedd@seebsdell> In-Reply-To: References: <6a084eda5fcb4423a647bb998471e26d@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <6bdfdff49ca04924979eba1da729d7e1@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <0c3dff3db46a4a83a73a4ffe1c83535d@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <340e2fcca899a6691605df89eb89f0e7e7802916.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <767f0527074648f48702fedcdb928152@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <20180918160944.43679aec@seebsdell> <20180918162048.35454f8d@seebsdell> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Yocto-mailing-list Subject: Re: [pseudo] Pseudo 1.8+ xattr sqlite corruption X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:39:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:33:37 +0100 "Burton, Ross" wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 at 22:21, Seebs wrote: > > > Are the databases supposed to be shareable between different build > > > machines? IIRC, the answer is no. Could you store the native inode > > > type as a sqlite BLOB? Not necessarily a good idea.... Just an > > > idea. > > > > I think coercing the values into range is probably safer. It should > > be trivial enough... > > That is an excellent catch and I'm hopeful that this explains the > failures in glibc-locales too that I still see occasionally. > > Is anyone actually writing a patch? I can try to get a proposed patch out sometime soon, I don't have an easy way to check it. -s