All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs
@ 2018-09-26 23:51 Brian Masney
  2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: msm-vibrator: new bindings for MSM vibrator PWM Brian Masney
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brian Masney @ 2018-09-26 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: thierry.reding, linux-pwm, andy.gross, david.brown, robh+dt,
	mark.rutland, linux-arm-msm, linux-soc, devicetree, linux-kernel
  Cc: masneyb, jonathan, ctatlor97

This patch set adds support for the vibrator found on various Qualcomm
MSM SOCs. This is based on work from:

Jonathan Marek from qcom,pwm-vibrator.c in the PostmarketOS repo:
https://gitlab.com/postmarketOS/linux-postmarketos/commit/7647fb36cb1cbd060f8b52087a68ab93583292b5

Jongrak Kwon and Devin Kim from msm_pwm_vibrator.c in the downstream
Android 3.4.0 sources:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-lenok-3.10-lollipop-wear-release/drivers/misc/msm_pwm_vibrator.c

Driver was tested on a LG Nexus 5 (hammerhead) phone using rumble-test:
https://git.collabora.com/cgit/user/sre/rumble-test.git/plain/rumble-test.c

Changes since v1
- Update device tree binding document based on feedback from Rob
  Herring.
- Changed the driver description to: Qualcomm PWM driver for the MSM
  vibrator.

Brian Masney (3):
  dt-bindings: pwm: msm-vibrator: new bindings for MSM vibrator PWM
  pwm: msm-vibrator: new driver for the vibrator found on various MSM
    SOCs
  ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add device tree bindings for
    vibrator

 .../bindings/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.txt         |  38 +++
 .../qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts    |  39 +++
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig                           |   9 +
 drivers/pwm/Makefile                          |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.c                | 227 ++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 314 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.c

-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: msm-vibrator: new bindings for MSM vibrator PWM
  2018-09-26 23:51 [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
@ 2018-09-26 23:51 ` Brian Masney
  2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: msm-vibrator: new driver for the vibrator found on various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brian Masney @ 2018-09-26 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: thierry.reding, linux-pwm, andy.gross, david.brown, robh+dt,
	mark.rutland, linux-arm-msm, linux-soc, devicetree, linux-kernel
  Cc: masneyb, jonathan, ctatlor97

This patch adds the device tree bindings for the vibrator PWM found on
various Qualcomm MSM SOCs.

Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
---
 .../bindings/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.txt         | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..44bb8b979c60
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+* Device tree bindings for the vibrator PWM on various MSM SOCs.
+
+Required properties:
+
+  - compatible: Should be one of
+		"qcom,msm8226-pwm-vibrator"
+		"qcom,msm8974-pwm-vibrator"
+  - reg: the base address and length of the IO memory for the registers.
+  - #pwm-cells: set to 3.
+  - pinctrl-names: set to default.
+  - pinctrl-0: phandles pointing to pin configuration nodes. See
+               Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
+  - clock-names: set to pwm
+  - clocks: phandle of the clock used by the PWM module. See
+            Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
+  - enable-gpios: GPIO that enables the PWM.
+
+Optional properties:
+
+  - vcc-supply: phandle to the regulator that provides power to the sensor.
+
+Example from a LG Nexus 5 (hammerhead) phone:
+
+msm_pwm_vibrator_enable: pwm@fd8c3450 {
+	reg = <0xfd8c3450 0x400>;
+	compatible = "qcom,msm8974-pwm-vibrator";
+	#pwm-cells = <3>;
+
+	vcc-supply = <&pm8941_l19>;
+
+	clocks = <&mmcc CAMSS_GP1_CLK>;
+	clock-names = "pwm";
+
+	enable-gpios = <&msmgpio 60 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&vibrator_pin>;
+};
-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: msm-vibrator: new driver for the vibrator found on various MSM SOCs
  2018-09-26 23:51 [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
  2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: msm-vibrator: new bindings for MSM vibrator PWM Brian Masney
@ 2018-09-26 23:51 ` Brian Masney
  2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add device tree bindings for vibrator Brian Masney
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brian Masney @ 2018-09-26 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: thierry.reding, linux-pwm, andy.gross, david.brown, robh+dt,
	mark.rutland, linux-arm-msm, linux-soc, devicetree, linux-kernel
  Cc: masneyb, jonathan, ctatlor97

This patch adds a new PWM vibrator driver that supports various
Qualcomm MSM SOCs. It is intended to be wired into the pwm-vibra driver
in the input/misc/ subsystem via device tree. Driver was tested on a
LG Nexus 5 (hammerhead) phone.

Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig            |   9 ++
 drivers/pwm/Makefile           |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.c | 227 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 237 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.c

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
index 504d252716f2..49dbcfd60f50 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
@@ -273,6 +273,15 @@ config PWM_MESON
 	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
 	  will be called pwm-meson.
 
+config PWM_MSM_VIBRATOR
+	tristate "Qualcomm PWM driver for the MSM vibrator"
+	help
+	  PWM support for the vibrator that is found on various Qualcomm
+          MSM SOCs.
+
+	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+	  will be called pwm-msm-vibrator.
+
 config PWM_MTK_DISP
 	tristate "MediaTek display PWM driver"
 	depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
index 9c676a0dadf5..60fd9f9b0fbb 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PCI)	+= pwm-lpss-pci.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PLATFORM)	+= pwm-lpss-platform.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MESON)		+= pwm-meson.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MEDIATEK)	+= pwm-mediatek.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MSM_VIBRATOR)	+= pwm-msm-vibrator.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MTK_DISP)	+= pwm-mtk-disp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MXS)		+= pwm-mxs.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_OMAP_DMTIMER)	+= pwm-omap-dmtimer.o
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..00ec40885eb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-msm-vibrator.c
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Qualcomm PWM driver for the MSM vibrator
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2018 Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
+ *
+ * Based on qcom,pwm-vibrator.c from:
+ * Copyright (c) 2018 Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
+ *
+ * Based on msm_pwm_vibrator.c from downstream Android sources:
+ * Copyright (C) 2009-2014 LGE, Inc.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+
+#define REG_CMD_RCGR		0x00
+#define REG_CFG_RCGR		0x04
+#define REG_M			0x08
+#define REG_N			0x0C
+#define REG_D			0x10
+#define REG_CBCR		0x24
+#define MMSS_CC_M_DEFAULT	1
+
+struct msm_vibra_pwm {
+	struct pwm_chip chip;
+	struct device *dev;
+	void __iomem *base;
+	struct regulator *vcc;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
+	bool enabled;
+};
+
+#define to_msm_vibra_pwm(pwm_chip) \
+	container_of(pwm_chip, struct msm_vibra_pwm, chip)
+
+#define msm_vibra_pwm_write(msm_pwm, offset, value) \
+	writel((value), (void __iomem *)((msm_pwm)->base + (offset)))
+
+static int msm_vibra_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				int duty_ns, int period_ns)
+{
+	struct msm_vibra_pwm *msm_pwm = to_msm_vibra_pwm(chip);
+	int d_reg_val;
+
+	d_reg_val = 127 - (((duty_ns / 1000) * 126) / (period_ns / 1000));
+
+	msm_vibra_pwm_write(msm_pwm, REG_CFG_RCGR,
+			    (2 << 12) | /* dual edge mode */
+			    (0 << 8) |  /* cxo */
+			    (7 << 0));
+	msm_vibra_pwm_write(msm_pwm, REG_M, 1);
+	msm_vibra_pwm_write(msm_pwm, REG_N, 128);
+	msm_vibra_pwm_write(msm_pwm, REG_D, d_reg_val);
+	msm_vibra_pwm_write(msm_pwm, REG_CMD_RCGR, 1);
+	msm_vibra_pwm_write(msm_pwm, REG_CBCR, 1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int msm_vibra_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	struct msm_vibra_pwm *msm_pwm = to_msm_vibra_pwm(chip);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate(msm_pwm->clk, 24000);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(msm_pwm->dev, "Failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(msm_pwm->clk);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(msm_pwm->dev, "Failed to enable clock: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = regulator_enable(msm_pwm->vcc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(msm_pwm->dev, "Failed to enable regulator: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(msm_pwm->enable_gpio, 1);
+	msm_pwm->enabled = true;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void msm_vibra_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	struct msm_vibra_pwm *msm_pwm = to_msm_vibra_pwm(chip);
+
+	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(msm_pwm->enable_gpio, 0);
+	regulator_disable(msm_pwm->vcc);
+	clk_disable_unprepare(msm_pwm->clk);
+	msm_pwm->enabled = false;
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops msm_vibra_pwm_ops = {
+	.config = msm_vibra_pwm_config,
+	.enable = msm_vibra_pwm_enable,
+	.disable = msm_vibra_pwm_disable,
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int msm_vibra_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct msm_vibra_pwm *msm_pwm;
+	struct resource *res;
+
+	msm_pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*msm_pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!msm_pwm)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	msm_pwm->dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+	msm_pwm->vcc = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vcc");
+	if (IS_ERR(msm_pwm->vcc)) {
+		if (PTR_ERR(msm_pwm->vcc) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get regulator: %ld\n",
+				PTR_ERR(msm_pwm->vcc));
+		return PTR_ERR(msm_pwm->vcc);
+	}
+
+	msm_pwm->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "enable",
+						       GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	if (IS_ERR(msm_pwm->enable_gpio)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get enable gpio: %ld\n",
+			PTR_ERR(msm_pwm->enable_gpio));
+		return PTR_ERR(msm_pwm->enable_gpio);
+	}
+
+	msm_pwm->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pwm");
+	if (IS_ERR(msm_pwm->clk)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to lookup pwm clock: %ld\n",
+			PTR_ERR(msm_pwm->clk));
+		return PTR_ERR(msm_pwm->clk);
+	}
+
+	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+	if (!res) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get platform resource\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	msm_pwm->base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
+				     resource_size(res));
+	if (IS_ERR(msm_pwm->base)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to iomap resource: %ld\n",
+			PTR_ERR(msm_pwm->base));
+		return PTR_ERR(msm_pwm->base);
+	}
+
+	msm_pwm->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
+	msm_pwm->chip.ops = &msm_vibra_pwm_ops;
+	msm_pwm->enabled = false;
+	msm_pwm->chip.npwm = 1;
+	msm_pwm->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
+	msm_pwm->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, msm_pwm);
+
+	return pwmchip_add(&msm_pwm->chip);
+}
+
+static __maybe_unused int msm_vibra_pwm_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct msm_vibra_pwm *msm_pwm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct pwm_device *pwm = msm_pwm->chip.pwms;
+
+	if (msm_pwm->enabled)
+		msm_vibra_pwm_disable(&msm_pwm->chip, pwm);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static __maybe_unused int msm_vibra_pwm_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int msm_vibra_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct msm_vibra_pwm *msm_pwm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct pwm_device *pwm = msm_pwm->chip.pwms;
+
+	if (msm_pwm->enabled)
+		msm_vibra_pwm_disable(&msm_pwm->chip, pwm);
+
+	return pwmchip_remove(&msm_pwm->chip);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id msm_vibra_pwm_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8226-pwm-vibrator" },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-pwm-vibrator" },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, msm_vibra_pwm_of_match);
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops msm_vibra_pwm_pm_ops = {
+	.suspend = msm_vibra_pwm_suspend,
+	.resume  = msm_vibra_pwm_resume,
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver msm_vibra_pwm_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "pwm-msm-vibrator",
+		.of_match_table = msm_vibra_pwm_of_match,
+		.pm = &msm_vibra_pwm_pm_ops,
+	},
+	.probe = msm_vibra_pwm_probe,
+	.remove = msm_vibra_pwm_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(msm_vibra_pwm_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm PWM driver for the MSM vibrator");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add device tree bindings for vibrator
  2018-09-26 23:51 [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
  2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: msm-vibrator: new bindings for MSM vibrator PWM Brian Masney
  2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: msm-vibrator: new driver for the vibrator found on various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
@ 2018-09-26 23:51 ` Brian Masney
  2018-10-12 11:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs Thierry Reding
  2018-10-16  0:52   ` Stephen Boyd
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brian Masney @ 2018-09-26 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: thierry.reding, linux-pwm, andy.gross, david.brown, robh+dt,
	mark.rutland, linux-arm-msm, linux-soc, devicetree, linux-kernel
  Cc: masneyb, jonathan, ctatlor97

This patch adds device device tree bindings for the vibrator found on
the LG Nexus 5 (hammerhead) phone.

Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
---
 .../qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts    | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts
index ed8f064d0895..e67d61f25a96 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,mmcc-msm8974.h>
 
 / {
 	model = "LGE MSM 8974 HAMMERHEAD";
@@ -268,6 +269,44 @@
 				input-enable;
 			};
 		};
+
+		vibrator_pin: vibrator {
+			pwm {
+				pins = "gpio27";
+				function = "gp1_clk";
+
+				drive-strength = <6>;
+				bias-disable;
+			};
+
+			enable {
+				pins = "gpio60";
+				function = "gpio";
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
+	msm_pwm_vibrator_enable: pwm@fd8c3450 {
+		compatible = "qcom,msm8974-pwm-vibrator";
+		reg = <0xfd8c3450 0x400>;
+		#pwm-cells = <3>;
+
+		vcc-supply = <&pm8941_l19>;
+
+		clocks = <&mmcc CAMSS_GP1_CLK>;
+		clock-names = "pwm";
+
+		enable-gpios = <&msmgpio 60 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&vibrator_pin>;
+	};
+
+	vibrator {
+		compatible = "pwm-vibrator";
+
+		pwms = <&msm_pwm_vibrator_enable 0 1000000000 0>;
+		pwm-names = "enable";
 	};
 
 	sdhci@f9824900 {
-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs
  2018-09-26 23:51 [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add device tree bindings for vibrator Brian Masney
@ 2018-10-12 11:47 ` Thierry Reding
  2018-10-16  0:52   ` Stephen Boyd
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2018-10-12 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brian Masney
  Cc: linux-pwm, andy.gross, david.brown, robh+dt, mark.rutland,
	linux-arm-msm, linux-soc, devicetree, linux-kernel, jonathan,
	ctatlor97

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1095 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 07:51:09PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> This patch set adds support for the vibrator found on various Qualcomm
> MSM SOCs. This is based on work from:
> 
> Jonathan Marek from qcom,pwm-vibrator.c in the PostmarketOS repo:
> https://gitlab.com/postmarketOS/linux-postmarketos/commit/7647fb36cb1cbd060f8b52087a68ab93583292b5
> 
> Jongrak Kwon and Devin Kim from msm_pwm_vibrator.c in the downstream
> Android 3.4.0 sources:
> https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-lenok-3.10-lollipop-wear-release/drivers/misc/msm_pwm_vibrator.c
> 
> Driver was tested on a LG Nexus 5 (hammerhead) phone using rumble-test:
> https://git.collabora.com/cgit/user/sre/rumble-test.git/plain/rumble-test.c

Looking at all of this it seems like this would be more appropriately
implemented as a force-feedback input device directly. The only reason
you seem to be making this a PWM driver is so that it can be used in
conjunction with pwm-vibrator. The device itself doesn't seem to be a
generic PWM in the way that the PWM framework expects it.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs
  2018-09-26 23:51 [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
@ 2018-10-16  0:52   ` Stephen Boyd
  2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: msm-vibrator: new driver for the vibrator found on various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
                     ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2018-10-16  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andy.gross, david.brown, devicetree, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-pwm, linux-soc, mark.rutland, robh+dt, thierry.reding
  Cc: masneyb, jonathan, ctatlor97

Quoting Brian Masney (2018-09-26 16:51:09)
> This patch set adds support for the vibrator found on various Qualcomm
> MSM SOCs. This is based on work from:

Can you please stop adding 'treewide:' to your cover letters? It is very
confusing while reading over subject summaries to see something that
isn't actually treewide end up being qcom specific.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs
@ 2018-10-16  0:52   ` Stephen Boyd
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2018-10-16  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brian Masney, andy.gross, david.brown, devicetree, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-kernel, linux-pwm, linux-soc, mark.rutland, robh+dt,
	thierry.reding
  Cc: masneyb, jonathan, ctatlor97

Quoting Brian Masney (2018-09-26 16:51:09)
> This patch set adds support for the vibrator found on various Qualcomm
> MSM SOCs. This is based on work from:

Can you please stop adding 'treewide:' to your cover letters? It is very
confusing while reading over subject summaries to see something that
isn't actually treewide end up being qcom specific.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-16  0:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-26 23:51 [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: msm-vibrator: new bindings for MSM vibrator PWM Brian Masney
2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: msm-vibrator: new driver for the vibrator found on various MSM SOCs Brian Masney
2018-09-26 23:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add device tree bindings for vibrator Brian Masney
2018-10-12 11:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs Thierry Reding
2018-10-16  0:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-10-16  0:52   ` Stephen Boyd

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.