From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mbuf: fix Tx offload mask
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 21:23:58 +0530
Message-ID: <20181001155357.GA1570@jerin>
References: <20180913134707.23698-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
 <20180913134707.23698-2-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
 <20d2c484-6c86-7c55-4973-d55f1da20a6c@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org,
 jiayu.hu@intel.com
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20d2c484-6c86-7c55-4973-d55f1da20a6c@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:45:02 +0100
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, Olivier Matz
>  <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> CC: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, jiayu.hu@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] mbuf: fix Tx offload mask
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>  Thunderbird/52.9.1
> 
> 
> On 9/13/2018 2:47 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > Fixes missing PKT_TX_UDP_SEG value in PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK.
> >
> > Fixes: 6d18505efaa6 ("vhost: support UDP Fragmentation Offload")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > Cc: jiayu.hu@intel.com
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > index 9ce5d76d7..6a5dbbc8f 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > @@ -343,7 +343,8 @@ extern "C" {
> >               PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT |        \
> >               PKT_TX_TUNNEL_MASK |     \
> >               PKT_TX_MACSEC |          \
> > -             PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD)
> > +             PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD |    \
> > +             PKT_TX_UDP_SEG)
> 
> Also can you sort the list, it seem there was an intention to sort from high
> bits to low, but broken, it makes easy to recognize missing items later.

I think, sorting from high bits to low bits makes it easy to recognize.
If it broken, How about fixing that(order based on bits) while rebasing to top of tree?

I don't have strong opinion or sorting based on bit order vs name. Just shared
my thought. Let me know your opinion, I will update it accordingly.