[PATCH v6 06/10] examples/power: increase allowed number of clients

From: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: john.mcnamara@intel.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	lei.a.yao@intel.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com,
	David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 06/10] examples/power: increase allowed number of clients
Date: Tue,  2 Oct 2018 09:43:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181002084328.57127-7-david.hunt@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181002084328.57127-1-david.hunt@intel.com>

Now that we're handling host policies, containers and virtual machines,
we'll rename MAX_VMS to MAX_CLIENTS, and increase from 4 to 64

Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
---
 examples/vm_power_manager/channel_manager.h |  4 ++--
 examples/vm_power_manager/channel_monitor.c | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/examples/vm_power_manager/channel_manager.h b/examples/vm_power_manager/channel_manager.h
index e32235b07..d948b304c 100644
--- a/examples/vm_power_manager/channel_manager.h
+++ b/examples/vm_power_manager/channel_manager.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct sockaddr_un _sockaddr_un;
 #define UNIX_PATH_MAX sizeof(_sockaddr_un.sun_path)
 #endif
 
-#define MAX_VMS 4
+#define MAX_CLIENTS 64
 #define MAX_VCPUS 20
 
 
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct libvirt_vm_info {
 	uint8_t num_cpus;
 };
 
-struct libvirt_vm_info lvm_info[MAX_VMS];
+struct libvirt_vm_info lvm_info[MAX_CLIENTS];
 /* Communication Channel Status */
 enum channel_status { CHANNEL_MGR_CHANNEL_DISCONNECTED = 0,
 	CHANNEL_MGR_CHANNEL_CONNECTED,
diff --git a/examples/vm_power_manager/channel_monitor.c b/examples/vm_power_manager/channel_monitor.c
index c3c3d7bb1..53a4efe45 100644
--- a/examples/vm_power_manager/channel_monitor.c
+++ b/examples/vm_power_manager/channel_monitor.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static volatile unsigned run_loop = 1;
 static int global_event_fd;
 static unsigned int policy_is_set;
 static struct epoll_event *global_events_list;
-static struct policy policies[MAX_VMS];
+static struct policy policies[MAX_CLIENTS];
 
 void channel_monitor_exit(void)
 {
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ update_policy(struct channel_packet *pkt)
 	RTE_LOG(INFO, CHANNEL_MONITOR,
 			"Applying policy for %s\n", pkt->vm_name);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_VMS; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_CLIENTS; i++) {
 		if (strcmp(policies[i].pkt.vm_name, pkt->vm_name) == 0) {
 			/* Copy the contents of *pkt into the policy.pkt */
 			policies[i].pkt = *pkt;
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ update_policy(struct channel_packet *pkt)
 		}
 	}
 	if (!updated) {
-		for (i = 0; i < MAX_VMS; i++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < MAX_CLIENTS; i++) {
 			if (policies[i].enabled == 0) {
 				policies[i].pkt = *pkt;
 				get_pcpu_to_control(&policies[i]);
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ remove_policy(struct channel_packet *pkt __rte_unused)
 	 * Disabling the policy is simply a case of setting
 	 * enabled to 0
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_VMS; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_CLIENTS; i++) {
 		if (strcmp(policies[i].pkt.vm_name, pkt->vm_name) == 0) {
 			policies[i].enabled = 0;
 			return 0;
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ run_channel_monitor(void)
 		if (policy_is_set) {
 			int j;
 
-			for (j = 0; j < MAX_VMS; j++) {
+			for (j = 0; j < MAX_CLIENTS; j++) {
 				if (policies[j].enabled == 1)
 					apply_policy(&policies[j]);
 			}
-- 
2.17.1
