Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  net/core/rtnetlink.c

between commit:

  893626d6a353 ("rtnetlink: Fail dump if target netnsid is invalid")

from the net tree and commits:

  c383edc42403 ("rtnetlink: add rtnl_get_net_ns_capable()")
  7e4a8d5a93f6 ("rtnetlink: s/IFLA_IF_NETNSID/IFLA_TARGET_NETNSID/g")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 7f37fe9c65a5,35162e1b06ad..000000000000
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@@ -1895,11 -1910,13 +1910,11 @@@ static int rtnl_dump_ifinfo(struct sk_b
  
  	if (nlmsg_parse(cb->nlh, hdrlen, tb, IFLA_MAX,
  			ifla_policy, NULL) >= 0) {
- 		if (tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID]) {
- 			netnsid = nla_get_s32(tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID]);
- 			tgt_net = get_target_net(skb->sk, netnsid);
+ 		if (tb[IFLA_TARGET_NETNSID]) {
+ 			netnsid = nla_get_s32(tb[IFLA_TARGET_NETNSID]);
+ 			tgt_net = rtnl_get_net_ns_capable(skb->sk, netnsid);
 -			if (IS_ERR(tgt_net)) {
 -				tgt_net = net;
 -				netnsid = -1;
 -			}
 +			if (IS_ERR(tgt_net))
 +				return PTR_ERR(tgt_net);
  		}
  
  		if (tb[IFLA_EXT_MASK])