From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E20C64EBC for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA942082A for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:54:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ABA942082A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727278AbeJDRrd (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:47:33 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:36914 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727109AbeJDRrd (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:47:33 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: Nedap ESD1 at mail.skyhub.de Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (blast.alien8.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9iLxEzf4aA6l; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BCA7500329C23FFFEA6A903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bca:7500:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 68F8B1EC02D1; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:54:43 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Paul Menzel Cc: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cmcgUsO2ZGVs?= , Thomas Gleixner , linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, lkml Subject: Re: x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address (ptrval)/0xc00a0000 Message-ID: <20181004105443.GH1864@zn.tnic> References: <0922cc1b-ed51-06e9-df81-57fd5aa8e7de@molgen.mpg.de> <20181003212255.GB28361@zn.tnic> <20181004080321.GA3630@8bytes.org> <20181004081429.GB1864@zn.tnic> <6cbb9135-7e89-748f-1d55-ac105a9f8091@molgen.mpg.de> <20181004084946.GD1864@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:59:18AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > I meant just the test you did. https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003212255.GB28361@zn.tnic > The SSD is also used in the Lenovo X60 and T60, which are > 32-bit systems. And what exactly is the problem when you access it on a 64-bit OS? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.