From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:45816 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727572AbeJERcI (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2018 13:32:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 07:33:52 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Niklas =?UTF-8?B?U8O2ZGVybHVuZA==?= , Hans Verkuil , Sebastian Reichel , Steve Longerbeam Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] media: v4l2-fwnode: cleanup functions that parse endpoints Message-ID: <20181005073352.7cdefbc9@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20181005100824.ibqcgva2iteoq3rt@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> References: <19c5acc2b8c64b37005a6934f6f54b32cf93c0dc.1538690587.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> <20181005080118.dvw5m7z2xgruu476@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> <20181005065220.360198b9@coco.lan> <20181005100824.ibqcgva2iteoq3rt@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Fri, 5 Oct 2018 13:08:25 +0300 Sakari Ailus escreveu: > > > This is still over 80 here. I think we could think of abbreviating what's > > > in the function name, not limiting to the endpoint. I think I'd prefer to > > > leave that for 4.21 as there's not much time anymore. > > > > Yes, I know. Renaming the function is the only way to get rid of > > those remaining warnings. If you're ok with renaming, IMHO it is best > > do do it right now, as we are already churning a lot of fwnode-related > > code, avoiding the need of touching it again for 4.21. > > This will presumably continue in v4.21 (or later). As noted in the cover > page of the fwnode patchset: > > This patchset does not address remaining issues such as supporting > setting defaults for e.g. bridge drivers with multiple ports, but > with Steve Longerbeam's patchset we're much closer to that goal. OK! Feel free to rename them when you feel ready. My suggestion is to do it at the end of a media merging cycle, as makes easier to avoid conflicts. I don't care that much about 80 cols. Yet, here it makes a point: we should be more spartan when naming functions :-) Thanks, Mauro