From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Gross Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Qualcomm ARM64 DT updates for 4.20 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:29:11 -0500 Message-ID: <20181005142911.GC15665@hector.nxp.com> References: <1538332682-12018-1-git-send-email-andy.gross@linaro.org> <1538332682-12018-2-git-send-email-andy.gross@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: arm-soc , Kevin Hilman , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Doug Anderson , Bjorn Andersson List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 8:38 PM Andy Gross wrote: > > > > The following changes since commit 5b394b2ddf0347bef56e50c69a58773c94343ff3: > > > > Linux 4.19-rc1 (2018-08-26 14:11:59 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agross/linux.git tags/qcom-arm64-for-4.20 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6db0483cf622fc690e32e0804f8b86061f13962a: > > > > Revert "dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-temp-alarm: Fix documentation of 'reg'" (2018-09-30 12:59:52 -0500) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Qualcomm ARM64 Updates for v4.20 > > > > * Update Coresight for MSM8916 > > * Switch to use mailbox for smp2p and smd on MSM8996 > > * Add dispcc, dsp, USB, regulator, and other nodes for SDM845 > > * Drop model/compatible from MSM8916 and MSM8996 > > * Add compat for db820c > > * Add MSM8998 SoC and board support along with associated nodes > > * Add RESIN/PON for Qualcomm PM8916 and PM8994 > > Pulled into next/dt, thanks. > > There is a small chance that the two reverts end up causing more > problems than they help: they might conflict with the patches merged > into the iio branch, or they could end up being applied on top of > the iio branch and revert the changes during the release. I think > it will be fine, but it's obviously better to avoid this. > Agreed, I'll check in on this once -rc1 hits to make sure they weren't removed. Andy