All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] pwm: lpss: Check PWM powerstate after resume on Cherry Trail devices
Date: Sat,  6 Oct 2018 11:22:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181006092230.8575-2-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181006092230.8575-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

The _PS0 method for the integrated graphics on some Cherry Trail devices
(observed on a HP Pavilion X2 10-p0XX) turns on the PWM chip (puts it in
D0), causing an inconsistency between the state the pm-core thinks it is
in (left runtime suspended as it was before the suspend/resume) and the
state it actually is in.

Interestingly enough this is done on a device where the pwm controller is
not used for the backlight at all, since it uses an eDP panel. On devices
where the PWM is used this is not a problem since we will resume it
ourselves anyways.

This inconsistency causes us to never suspend the pwm controller again,
which causes the device to not be able to reach S0ix states when suspended.

This commit adds a resume-complete handler, which when we think the device
is still run-time suspended checks the actual power-state and if necessary
updates the rpm-core's internal state.

This fixes the Pavilion X2 10-p0XX not reaching S0ix states when suspended.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
Changes in v2:
-Do the pm_runtime_en/disable before/after checking the power-state
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss-platform.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h          |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss-platform.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss-platform.c
index 7304f36ee715..390ee50157a1 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss-platform.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss-platform.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo pwm_lpss_bsw_info = {
 	.clk_rate = 19200000,
 	.npwm = 1,
 	.base_unit_bits = 16,
+	.check_power_on_resume = true,
 };
 
 /* Broxton */
@@ -74,9 +75,29 @@ static int pwm_lpss_remove_platform(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return pwm_lpss_remove(lpwm);
 }
 
-static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pwm_lpss_platform_pm_ops,
-			 pwm_lpss_suspend,
-			 pwm_lpss_resume);
+static void pwm_lpss_complete(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	unsigned long long psc;
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	/* The PWM may be turned on by AML code, update our state to match */
+	if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev) && lpwm->info->check_power_on_resume) {
+		pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+
+		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), "_PSC",
+					       NULL, &psc);
+		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && psc == ACPI_STATE_D0)
+			pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+
+		pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+	}
+}
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops pwm_lpss_platform_pm_ops = {
+	.complete = pwm_lpss_complete,
+	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pwm_lpss_suspend, pwm_lpss_resume)
+};
 
 static const struct acpi_device_id pwm_lpss_acpi_match[] = {
 	{ "80860F09", (unsigned long)&pwm_lpss_byt_info },
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h
index 8f029ed263af..1a2575d25bea 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo {
 	unsigned int npwm;
 	unsigned long base_unit_bits;
 	bool bypass;
+	/* Some devices have AML code messing with the state underneath us */
+	bool check_power_on_resume;
 };
 
 struct pwm_lpss_chip *pwm_lpss_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *r,
-- 
2.19.0

      reply	other threads:[~2018-10-06  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-06  9:22 [PATCH v3 1/2] pwm: lpss: Move struct pwm_lpss_chip definition to the header file Hans de Goede
2018-10-06  9:22 ` Hans de Goede [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181006092230.8575-2-hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.