From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ipmail03.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.143]:40705 "EHLO ipmail03.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725867AbeJHFLn (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 01:11:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 09:02:58 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] xfs: remove magic handling of unwritten extents in xfs_bmapi_allocate Message-ID: <20181007220258.GC18095@dastard> References: <20181002174207.25275-1-hch@lst.de> <20181002174207.25275-4-hch@lst.de> <20181006093433.GA18095@dastard> <20181006094331.GA5845@lst.de> <20181007101319.GA25721@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181007101319.GA25721@lst.de> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 12:13:19PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 11:43:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I suspect the asserts actually are what is incorrect. But given > > how late we are in the cycle I've just dropped the patch and kicked > > off xfstests runs (now including rmap, sigh..). > > Without this patch test runs including rmap succeed. Do you want > me to resend with the patch dropped (thing should just apply without > it as-is). I'll drop it and see what happens... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com