From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ED4F7B42 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADC236C5 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:24:53 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: James Bottomley Message-ID: <20181008162453.4fb61e84@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-kernel , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Em Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:36:39 -0700 James Bottomley escreveu: > From 4a614e9440148894207bef5bf69e74071baceb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: James Bottomley > Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting = email > addresses >=20 > The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishi= ng > private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since > the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the pa= tch > process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected= by > the project to correct this ambiguity. >=20 > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley > --- > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/pr= ocess/code-of-conduct.rst > index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants inclu= de: > * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political att= acks > * Public or private harassment > * Publishing others=E2=80=99 private information, such as a physical or = electronic > - address, without explicit permission > + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit perm= ission > * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a > professional setting > =20 Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Thanks, Mauro From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69713C65C20 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A32F2089D for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="GmkmTy+J" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2A32F2089D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726683AbeJICiO (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 22:38:14 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:59052 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726442AbeJICiN (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 22:38:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=88jt1Az8R97debx84AODlw0f4ebESIla5/5/3d7NFK8=; b=GmkmTy+J9O+dUj6OYJPO7sx5v hkqa7EuzlOMyu8LVfl72Sz3Ru/4Dsmi+iOHZ1pAEqfCtj1vZcRQEeYzslQsBIIpDxb4Ly1kpBL0oe W0QqL/9zLwaTtAqU5Z1GWBPEusk6anjQr7bq+/aOmo6IalWh3MSqJ0Ist29Bn5swfMXo+xX02ndst EaUSIpgT9msdWq0K4DdziNeqL2xoyyhirbc5z2yzUx+df9RmGiLzazft5r0uX4AutUHBpEmqvGEsc K6XM0ph4g0p38h2wdZVbOiTpIKFRr1W5UrPyLOKsyyH0HMVWqYoZb4bUdRNeVnQNauNvrbM0Gi20n /a9MM6odw==; Received: from [179.183.98.126] (helo=coco.lan) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1g9b9D-00073c-Ua; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:24:56 +0000 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:24:53 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: James Bottomley Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses Message-ID: <20181008162453.4fb61e84@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:36:39 -0700 James Bottomley escreveu: > From 4a614e9440148894207bef5bf69e74071baceb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: James Bottomley > Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting = email > addresses >=20 > The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishi= ng > private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since > the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the pa= tch > process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected= by > the project to correct this ambiguity. >=20 > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley > --- > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/pr= ocess/code-of-conduct.rst > index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants inclu= de: > * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political att= acks > * Public or private harassment > * Publishing others=E2=80=99 private information, such as a physical or = electronic > - address, without explicit permission > + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit perm= ission > * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a > professional setting > =20 Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Thanks, Mauro