From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D179C677D4 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081772064A for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MYU0rXUP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 081772064A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728222AbeJIBsY (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:48:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60572 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726522AbeJIBsY (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:48:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip-213-127-77-176.ip.prioritytelecom.net [213.127.77.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F7F42064A; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:35:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1539023721; bh=tisW1AGSdOL7jD+h/cHDjbs4Zb9EmGOaOlgYCUlI1xo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MYU0rXUPqtz2BBtwGOiCUa4yScqDlyBAfSDcyiMIbkFgaIB6OEGZ7VLaMq9WK59hM JKMsvt4J9kq9wQ2YUOS7C/bu13W/proP9jYWpV+UJxyKqHAbsQLcUIoe32P9OH4rYJ 32ocRtTpmSlsQGwb5Pu/dRRlgVHDS/DuYZpcAnzM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoffer Dall , Mark Rutland , Dave Martin , Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon Subject: [PATCH 4.4 062/113] arm64: KVM: Tighten guest core register access from userspace Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 20:31:03 +0200 Message-Id: <20181008175534.399469315@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.0 In-Reply-To: <20181008175530.864641368@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181008175530.864641368@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dave Martin commit d26c25a9d19b5976b319af528886f89cf455692d upstream. We currently allow userspace to access the core register file in about any possible way, including straddling multiple registers and doing unaligned accesses. This is not the expected use of the ABI, and nobody is actually using it that way. Let's tighten it by explicitly checking the size and alignment for each field of the register file. Cc: Fixes: 2f4a07c5f9fe ("arm64: KVM: guest one-reg interface") Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Dave Martin [maz: rewrote Dave's initial patch to be more easily backported] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c @@ -48,6 +48,45 @@ static u64 core_reg_offset_from_id(u64 i return id & ~(KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE); } +static int validate_core_offset(const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) +{ + u64 off = core_reg_offset_from_id(reg->id); + int size; + + switch (off) { + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]) ... + KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[30]): + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp): + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.pc): + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.pstate): + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(sp_el1): + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(elr_el1): + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[0]) ... + KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_NR_SPSR - 1]): + size = sizeof(__u64); + break; + + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0]) ... + KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[31]): + size = sizeof(__uint128_t); + break; + + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr): + case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpcr): + size = sizeof(__u32); + break; + + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) == size && + IS_ALIGNED(off, size / sizeof(__u32))) + return 0; + + return -EINVAL; +} + static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) { /* @@ -67,6 +106,9 @@ static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu (off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs) return -ENOENT; + if (validate_core_offset(reg)) + return -EINVAL; + if (copy_to_user(uaddr, ((u32 *)regs) + off, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id))) return -EFAULT; @@ -89,6 +131,9 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu (off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs) return -ENOENT; + if (validate_core_offset(reg)) + return -EINVAL; + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) > sizeof(tmp)) return -EINVAL;