From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6D9C43441 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450A421479 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:14:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 450A421479 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726491AbeJJOfm (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:35:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60046 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726476AbeJJOfm (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:35:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C62CD301A3BC; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-204-219.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.219]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1A328DCD; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:14:52 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Golle , Mathias Kresin , Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] rt2800: fix registers init for MT7620 Message-ID: <20181010071451.GA9140@redhat.com> References: <1539086170-32528-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <1539086170-32528-4-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.41]); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:27:31AM +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote: > On 09/10/2018, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > There is dupliceted 'if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352))' entry that couses > > we do not perform proper register initaliztion for RT6352 (MT7620 SOCs). > > > > Reported-by: Tomislav Požega > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > > b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > > index daf20d7424ac..170e7c87f7bc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > > @@ -5451,8 +5451,7 @@ static int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev > > *rt2x00dev) > > 0x00000000); > > } > > } else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5390) || > > - rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392) || > > - rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) { > > + rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392)) { > > rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000404); > > rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00080606); > > rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000); > > -- > > 2.7.5 > > > > > > > have you got chance to test > https://github.com/psyborg55/linux/commit/24b46d482590a87553df1de0b5c8032f363cb7cf > ? > > using this code to determine 7620 soc > > if (rt == RT5390 && rt2x00_is_soc(rt2x00dev)) > rt = RT6352; > > somehow did not work in rt2800_init_registers routine. i could verify > that by removing tx_sw_cfg registers from rt6352 and the wifi would > still work, unless removed them from rt5390 also I tested by adding additional printk("Init RT6352 registers\n"); in if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) branch. The message was printed: [ 68.049946] ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rt: Info - RT chipset 6352, rev 0500 detected [ 68.065392] ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rf: Info - RF chipset 7620 detected [ 68.079777] ieee80211 phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'minstrel_ht' [ 68.177760] kmodloader: done loading kernel modules from /etc/modules.d/* [ 68.825758] urandom_read: 5 callbacks suppressed [ 68.825768] random: jshn: uninitialized urandom read (4 bytes read) [ 77.792400] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device eth0 [ 77.825045] br-lan: port 1(eth0.1) entered blocking state [ 77.836032] br-lan: port 1(eth0.1) entered disabled state [ 77.847156] device eth0.1 entered promiscuous mode [ 77.856739] device eth0 entered promiscuous mode [ 77.931043] br-lan: port 1(eth0.1) entered blocking state [ 77.941861] br-lan: port 1(eth0.1) entered forwarding state [ 77.953171] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): br-lan: link is not ready [ 78.849852] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): br-lan: link becomes ready [ 82.302306] Init RT6352 registers Perhaps rt2x00_is_soc(rt2x00dev) does not work on this particular system that you have and device is configured as RT5390 ? I.e. maybe this is PCIe device. This should be printed in : ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rt: Info - RT chipset 6352, rev 0500 detected line, you should have 'RT chipset 5390' instead. Thanks Stanislaw