From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com ([209.85.167.65]:44471 "EHLO mail-lf1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727799AbeJKO4F (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:56:05 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id m18-v6so5895478lfl.11 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:30:02 +0200 From: Niklas =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6derlund?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77980: add thermal support Message-ID: <20181011073002.GH24305@bigcity.dyn.berto.se> References: <90934111-8cc5-482d-8a78-5ccc1113e42d@cogentembedded.com> <20181010221142.GG24305@bigcity.dyn.berto.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Simon Horman , Rob Herring , Linux-Renesas , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Magnus Damm , Mark Rutland List-ID: Hi Geert, On 2018-10-11 09:02:22 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Niklas, > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:11 AM Niklas S�derlund > wrote: > > On 2018-10-10 22:18:11 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > > Describe THS/CIVM in the R8A77980 device trees. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > > > > --- renesas.orig/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi > > > +++ renesas/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi > > > @@ -330,6 +330,19 @@ > > > #power-domain-cells = <1>; > > > }; > > > > > > + tsc: thermal@e6198000 { > > > + compatible = "renesas,r8a77980-thermal"; > > > + reg = <0 0xe6198000 0 0x100>, > > > + <0 0xe61a0000 0 0x100>; > > > + interrupts = , > > > + , > > > + ; > > > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 522>; > > > + power-domains = <&sysc R8A77980_PD_ALWAYS_ON>; > > > + resets = <&cpg 522>; > > > + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; > > > > The status property is missing but as you told me in v1 it should not > > matter. I will leave it for Simon to decide if he wants it to keep it > > consistent with other SoC or if we should remove it from the other dtsi > > files. In any case with or without the status property. > > Forgot to review commit c79661eb5060e2bf ("arm64: dts: renesas: Remove > unneeded status from thermal nodes")? ;-) Not only that also reviewing using the context from v4.19-rc1 which of course is not correct for dtsi patches, thanks for enlightening me :-) -- Regards, Niklas S�derlund