From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C213C32788 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA732098A for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:05:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DEA732098A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727881AbeJKRcC (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:32:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47278 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726215AbeJKRcB (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:32:01 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A95307C941; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-204-112.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.112]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754128C06B; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:05:25 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Tom Psyborg Cc: Daniel Golle , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Kresin , Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] rt2800: fix registers init for MT7620 Message-ID: <20181011100524.GA20794@redhat.com> References: <1539086170-32528-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <1539086170-32528-4-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <20181010071451.GA9140@redhat.com> <20181010120657.GA1185@makrotopia.org> <20181010124508.GA22330@redhat.com> <20181010154054.GA27779@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.46]); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:03:12PM +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote: > ok, that is strange. do you see any performance differences without > TX_SW_CFG regs? iperf test is a good pointer. > > this was a problem on xiaomi mini with old DD trunk builds on 4.4 > kernel and LEDE builds from last year. i ain't got no chance to try > this on 18.06. which device you tried this on? if ipa/ilna it might > make no difference No diffrence for me. I have nexx wt3020 8M. However I notice this set couse performance regression for me. When connecting to iwl 7265 . Without the set I have: root@LEDE:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.10.243 Connecting to host 192.168.10.243, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.10.1 port 59304 connected to 192.168.10.243 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 5.37 MBytes 44.9 Mbits/sec 0 279 KBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 5.80 MBytes 48.8 Mbits/sec 0 494 KBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 6.03 MBytes 50.5 Mbits/sec 0 513 KBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.01 sec 5.90 MBytes 49.2 Mbits/sec 0 513 KBytes [ 5] 4.01-5.01 sec 5.90 MBytes 49.5 Mbits/sec 0 515 KBytes [ 5] 5.01-6.00 sec 5.78 MBytes 48.9 Mbits/sec 0 515 KBytes [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 5.66 MBytes 47.4 Mbits/sec 0 515 KBytes [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 6.03 MBytes 50.6 Mbits/sec 0 515 KBytes [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 6.09 MBytes 50.9 Mbits/sec 0 515 KBytes [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 5.72 MBytes 48.2 Mbits/sec 0 515 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 58.3 MBytes 48.9 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 58.3 MBytes 48.9 Mbits/sec receiver With the set I have: root@LEDE:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.10.243 Connecting to host 192.168.10.243, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.10.1 port 45824 connected to 192.168.10.243 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.78 MBytes 31.7 Mbits/sec 0 197 KBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.71 MBytes 31.0 Mbits/sec 0 369 KBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.51 MBytes 29.5 Mbits/sec 0 484 KBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.36 MBytes 28.1 Mbits/sec 0 519 KBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.10 MBytes 34.4 Mbits/sec 0 519 KBytes [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 3.73 MBytes 31.2 Mbits/sec 0 519 KBytes [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 4.29 MBytes 36.0 Mbits/sec 0 519 KBytes [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 4.16 MBytes 34.9 Mbits/sec 0 519 KBytes [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 4.35 MBytes 36.5 Mbits/sec 0 519 KBytes [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.41 MBytes 37.0 Mbits/sec 0 519 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 39.4 MBytes 33.0 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 39.4 MBytes 33.0 Mbits/sec receiver Stanislaw