From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: ti-lmu: Remove LM3697 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 20:03:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20181012180312.GB5565@amd> References: <20181011165123.32198-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20181011165123.32198-3-dmurphy@ti.com> <20181011182734.GA7973@amd> <4fcb91c7-b2b2-798d-8a41-fa1b475086e0@ti.com> <8c1559e1-b703-4c98-8bd9-7c9993bd59f5@gmail.com> <20181012162619.GA28573@bogus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181012162619.GA28573@bogus> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Jacek Anaszewski , Dan Murphy , lee.jones@linaro.org, tony@atomide.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > >>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy > > >> > > >> NAK. > > >=20 > > > Thanks for the NAK. > > >=20 > > > This NAK was NAK'd by other maintainer in the V2 RFC patchset > > >=20 > > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/993171/ > >=20 > > I confirm. LM3697 is a standalone device and not a cell of any > > MFD device. > >=20 > > Waiting for DT maintainer's ack. >=20 > You all sort out what you want... I can't follow it all, and I'm not=20 > going to spend the time trying to figure out what is going on here. This is what I want: > As this is worded, changing the driver is a Linux problem and irrelevant= =20 > to the binding. Now if you want to move documentation to a location that= =20 > makes more sense, then fine. But structure patches that way and make it= =20 > clear that from an binding ABI perspective, nothing is changing. =2E..but apparently I did not have enough authority to get it. (I'm ok with move, and it is possible that binding does need some fixups besides the move; still it should be done as fixup not as a new binding). Thanks, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlvA4eAACgkQMOfwapXb+vKgBQCfUIZ/eXRCOTCJUVJpsOGMC5nR 58oAn37DSu7PFR32erjNbDh23QXc4GIz =qPga -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes--