From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55567) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCJDy-0006Kb-PS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:53:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCJDv-0007gf-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:53:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCJDv-0007dg-1i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:52:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:52:56 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann Message-ID: <20181016065256.zhusncujzgfyr3wn@sirius.home.kraxel.org> References: <20181015115309.17089-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20181015115309.17089-28-armbru@redhat.com> <2fe22e4c-d7b8-f41e-493c-ffd8b7169e44@suse.com> <87woqiv8ii.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87woqiv8ii.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 27/35] vnc: Clean up error reporting in vnc_init_func() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Fei Li , qemu-devel@nongnu.org > >> + error_propagate(errp, local_err); > > Shall we use error_propagate(errp, local_err, ("Failed to init VNC > > server: "); > > like vnc_display_open does? > > I don't know. > > The error reporting is somewhat poor around here. Consider: > > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -display vnc=:0,share=nope > qemu-system-x86_64: -display vnc=:0,share=nope: Failed to start VNC server: unknown vnc share= option > > The "Failed to start VNC server: " prefix doesn't really add value. Indeed. > Gerd, what do you think? I'd keep the messages short. cheers, Gerd