From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr in immovable memory Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:11:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20181016191113.GI5212@zn.tnic> References: <20181010093057.GA22088@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20181010194443.sgdvplwdnltshwwi@gabell> <20181011002955.GJ25297@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20181011055154.GB6667@localhost.localdomain> <20181013201958.zfzv5ahhe3xz7bwi@gabell> <20181013203429.GE31650@zn.tnic> <20181013214550.ag5qzokhkrkwnzsy@gabell> <20181013220541.GI31650@zn.tnic> <20181015005035.z3xym6nx43hogdge@gabell> <20181016151353.punyk7exekut2543@gabell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181016151353.punyk7exekut2543@gabell> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Masayoshi Mizuma Cc: Baoquan He , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Chao Fan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, keescook@chromium.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:13:54AM -0400, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote: > Hi Boris, Baoquan and all, > > I have created a RFC patch for adjust KASLR padding size. > This patch is based on Can's v8 patch [1/3], and the Can's patch > will be changed in the future, so this patch is just RFC. > > Welcome to any comments and suggestions. Thanks! ... > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h > index a06cbf019744..c987c725e93a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h > @@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ struct boot_params { > __u8 _pad7[0x290-0x1f1-sizeof(struct setup_header)]; > __u32 edd_mbr_sig_buffer[EDD_MBR_SIG_MAX]; /* 0x290 */ > struct boot_e820_entry e820_table[E820_MAX_ENTRIES_ZEROPAGE]; /* 0x2d0 */ > - __u8 _pad8[48]; /* 0xcd0 */ > + __u8 _pad8[40]; /* 0xcd0 */ > + __u64 possible_mem_addr; /* 0xcf8 */ Where in the example I gave you with add_e820ext() do you see members being added to struct boot_params? Take a look at it again pls. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.