From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F511F453 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727966AbeJRCKo (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 22:10:44 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:43706 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1727082AbeJRCKn (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 22:10:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 6956 invoked by uid 109); 17 Oct 2018 18:13:52 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:13:52 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 21694 invoked by uid 111); 17 Oct 2018 18:13:03 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:13:03 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:13:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:13:51 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Bob Peterson , Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] revision: Add --sticky-default option Message-ID: <20181017181350.GB28326@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20181016212438.30176-1-agruenba@redhat.com> <20181017091215.GA2052@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:53:41PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 11:12, Jeff King wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:24:38PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > > here's a long-overdue update of my proposal from August 29: > > > > > > [RFC] revision: Don't let ^ cancel out the default > > > > > > Does this look more acceptable that my first shot? > > > > I think it's going in the right direction. > > > > The name "--sticky-default" did not immediately make clear to me what it > > does. Is there some name that would be more obvious? > > It's the best I could think of. Better ideas, anyone? I'd probably call it something verbose and boring like --use-default-with-uninteresting or --default-on-negative. I dunno. -Peff