From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578D4C5ACCC for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F372145D for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:34:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 18F372145D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727062AbeJRUf2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:35:28 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52930 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726417AbeJRUf1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:35:27 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31C8AC90; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:34:37 +0200 From: Petr Mladek To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Jason Baron , Joe Lawrence , Evgenii Shatokhin , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jessica Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/12] livepatch: Use lists to manage patches, objects and functions Message-ID: <20181018123437.msigfmpbdv2d6jvt@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20181015123713.25868-1-pmladek@suse.com> <20181015123713.25868-8-pmladek@suse.com> <20181017203107.lirzlz2sulntauqq@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181017203107.lirzlz2sulntauqq@treble> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 2018-10-17 15:31:07, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:37:08PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > +static int klp_init_lists(struct klp_patch *patch) > > +{ > > + struct klp_object *obj; > > + struct klp_func *func; > > + > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&patch->obj_list); > > + if (!patch->objs) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + klp_for_each_object_static(patch, obj) { > > + list_add(&obj->node, &patch->obj_list); > > + > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->func_list); > > + if (!obj->funcs) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + klp_for_each_func_static(obj, func) > > + list_add(&func->node, &obj->func_list); > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > It may be ever-so-slightly better to use list_add_tail() instead of > list_add(), so the list order matches the array order. I doubt the > ordering really matters, but you never know. It could for example make > debugging a little easier in some scenarios. Makes sense. Will do in v14. Best Regareds, Petr