From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:43:19 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Ming Lei Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Matthew Wilcox , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov , Dave Chinner , Linux FS Devel , "Darrick J . Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] block: introduce helpers for allocating IO buffers from slab Message-ID: <20181019054319.GL6311@dastard> References: <20181018131817.11813-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20181018131817.11813-5-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20181018144207.GD26828@lst.de> <20181018151123.GD32429@bombadil.infradead.org> <20181018152219.GB28300@lst.de> <20181019025348.GB14531@ming.t460p> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20181019025348.GB14531@ming.t460p> List-ID: On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:53:49AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 05:22:19PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 08:11:23AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 04:42:07PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > This all seems quite complicated. > > > > > > > > I think the interface we'd want is more one that has a little > > > > cache of a single page in the queue, and a little bitmap which > > > > sub-page size blocks of it are used. > > > > > > > > Something like (pseudo code minus locking): > > > > > > > > void *blk_alloc_sector_buffer(struct block_device *bdev, gfp_t gfp) > > > > { > > > > unsigned block_size = block_size(bdev); > > > > > > > > if (blocksize >= PAGE_SIZE) > > > > return (void *)__get_free_pages(gfp, get_order(blocksize)); > > > > > > > > if (bdev->fragment_cache_page) { > > > > [ fragment_cache_page using > > > > e.g. bitmap and return if found] > > > > } > > > > > > > > bdev->fragment_cache_page = (void *)__get_free_page(gfp); > > > > goto find_again; > > > > } > > > > > > This looks a lot like page_frag_alloc() except I think page_frag_alloc() > > > may be more efficient. > > > > Oh, nice. Sounds like XFS should just use page_frag_alloc. I'll give > > it a spin. > > XFS or other fs can use page_frag_alloc() directly, seems not necessary to > introduce this change in block layer any more given 512-aligned buffer > should be fine everywhere. > > The only benefit to make it as block helper is that the offset or size > can be checked with q->dma_alignment. > > Dave/Jens, do you think which way is better? Put allocation as block > helper or fs uses page_frag_alloc() directly for allocating 512*N-byte > buffer(total size is less than PAGE_SIZE)? Cristoph has already said he's looking at using page_frag_alloc() directly in XFS.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com