From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Matz Subject: Re: [RFC 00/14] prefix network structures Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:32:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20181024083222.onska6y4cah2h6e4@platinum> References: <20181024081833.21432-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDBC5B26 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:32:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rsa59-2-82-233-193-189.fbx.proxad.net ([82.233.193.189] helo=droids-corp.org) by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gFEbm-0005ky-Gv for dev@dpdk.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:33:44 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181024081833.21432-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:18:19AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote: > This RFC targets 19.02. > > The rte_net headers conflict with the libc headers, because > some definitions are duplicated, sometimes with few differences. > This was discussed in [1], and more recently at the techboard. Sorry, the reference was missing: [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-January/087384.html