All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thesven73@gmail.com
To: svendev@arcx.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, denis@eukrea.com,
	rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/1] imx-drm: match ipu_di_signal_cfg's clk_pol with its observed behaviour.
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:15:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181025181518.4433-1-TheSven73@googlemail.com> (raw)

Hi Russell, thanks for looking at the RFC !

> Given what's in the documentation, I'd opt for it describing the
> edge that the output data changes, not the latch edge.  With that
> interpretation, the existing code is correct.

The clock polarity is reversed in Freescale's non-mainline fbdev code,
which we were using previously, contributing to the confusion.

Yes, I think your interpretation is the correct one. Let's double-check.

Suppose we set this bus flag in the panel/mode definition:

drm/drm_connector.h:
/* drive data on pos. edge */
#define DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE	(1<<2)

According to your interpretation, this means we're asking the data to change
on the positive edge, and be stable on the negative edge. Correct?

then clk_pol == 1:
drivers/gpu/drm/imx/ipuv3-crtc.c:
	sig_cfg.clk_pol = !!(imx_crtc_state->bus_flags &
			     DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE);

then DI_GENERAL bit 17 is set:
drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-di.c:
	if (sig->clk_pol)
		di_gen |= DI_GEN_POLARITY_DISP_CLK;

and data is stable on the pixel clock's falling edge, as we observed on
the oscilloscope.

All good. Thank you !

             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-25 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-25 18:15 thesven73 [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-25 16:17 [RFC v1 0/1] imx-drm: match ipu_di_signal_cfg's clk_pol with its observed behaviour thesven73

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181025181518.4433-1-TheSven73@googlemail.com \
    --to=thesven73@gmail.com \
    --cc=denis@eukrea.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=svendev@arcx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.