From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: qcom/emac: add phy-handle support for ACPI Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20181026131301.GC30093@lunn.ch> References: <78719753-77bd-596a-dfc7-ccd676850283@kernel.org> <7935985e49270ad2948b2a52d26510bdf55572e6.1540459999.git.dongsheng.wang@hxt-semitech.com> <20181025192430.GA16785@lunn.ch> <0a55d42c839140dd9a5264ab4dae4c8e@HXTBJIDCEMVIW02.hxtcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Wang, Dongsheng" Cc: Timur Tabi , "Zheng, Joey" , "f.fainelli@gmail.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "robert.moore@intel.com" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 03:04:25AM +0000, Wang, Dongsheng wrote: > On 2018/10/26 10:37, Timur Tabi wrote: > > On 10/25/18 9:18 PM, Wang, Dongsheng wrote: > >> But when I was reading Documentation/acpi/DSD-properties-rules.txt, my > >> understanding is we should try to conform to DT bindings. So maybe ACPI > >> doesn't have such a document, just DT bindings. > > There was an attempt to document DSDs, but it was abandoned after a while. > > > > https://github.com/ahs3/dsd > > > > Yes, here's a database concept, and I asked some Intel guys, the answer > I got was there is no such database or document. :( Hi Dongsheng If there is no clear documentation for ACPI, it becomes even more important that the xgene code is refactored into a central location, and you make use of it. We really need to avoid every ACPI ethernet driver doing its own thing. Thanks Andrew