From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:00:40 +0000 Message-ID: <20181027150024.GA2294@jerin> References: <1537172244-64874-2-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> <1539757786-226178-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> <1874944.OrACW1nkDZ@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" , "dev@dpdk.org" , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "stable@dpdk.org" , Ola Liljedahl , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1874944.OrACW1nkDZ@xps> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" -----Original Message----- > Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:39:58 +0200 > From: Thomas Monjalon > To: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" > , Honnappa Nagarahalli > , "stable@dpdk.org" , Ola > Liljedahl , olivier.matz@6wind.com, > chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, > konstantin.ananyev@intel.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store = of > the tail >=20 > External Email >=20 > 17/10/2018 08:35, Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China): > > Hi Jerin > > > > As the 1st one of the 3-patch set was not concluded, I submit this 2-pa= tch series to unblock the merge. >=20 > The thread is totally messed up because: > - there is no cover letter > - some different series (testpmd, i40e and doc) are in the same t= hread > - v4 replies to a different series > - this version should be a v5 but has no number > - this version replies to the v3 > - patchwork still shows v3 and "v5" > - replies from Ola are not quoting previous discussion >=20 > Because of all of this, it is really difficult to follow. > This is probably the reason of the lack of review outside of Arm. >=20 > One more issue: you must Cc the relevant maintainers. > Here: > - Olivier for rte_ring > - Chao for IBM platform > - Bruce and Konstantin for x86 >=20 > Guys, it is really cool to have more Arm developpers in DPDK. > But please consider better formatting your discussions, it is really > important in our contribution workflow. >=20 > I don't know what to do. > I suggest to wait for more feedbacks and integrate it in -rc2. This series has been acked and tested. Sure, if we are looking for some more feedback we can push to -rc2 if not it a good candidate to be selected for -rc1. >=20 >=20 >=20