All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
	Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:02:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181030150254.GB3385@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181029224031.29809-2-tycho@tycho.ws>

On 10/29, Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> +static long seccomp_notify_recv(struct seccomp_filter *filter,
> +				void __user *buf)
> +{
> +	struct seccomp_knotif *knotif = NULL, *cur;
> +	struct seccomp_notif unotif;
> +	ssize_t ret;
> +
> +	memset(&unotif, 0, sizeof(unotif));
> +
> +	ret = down_interruptible(&filter->notif->request);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&filter->notify_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(cur, &filter->notif->notifications, list) {
> +		if (cur->state == SECCOMP_NOTIFY_INIT) {
> +			knotif = cur;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If we didn't find a notification, it could be that the task was
> +	 * interrupted by a fatal signal between the time we were woken and
> +	 * when we were able to acquire the rw lock.
> +	 *
> +	 * This is the place where we handle the extra high semaphore count
> +	 * mentioned in seccomp_do_user_notification().
> +	 */
> +	if (!knotif) {
> +		ret = -ENOENT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	unotif.id = knotif->id;
> +	unotif.pid = task_pid_vnr(knotif->task);
> +	if (knotif->signaled)
> +		unotif.flags |= SECCOMP_NOTIF_FLAG_SIGNALED;
> +	unotif.data = *(knotif->data);

Tycho, I forgot everything about seccomp, most probably I am wrong but let me
ask anyway.

__seccomp_filter(SECCOMP_RET_TRACE) does

		/*
		 * Recheck the syscall, since it may have changed. This
		 * intentionally uses a NULL struct seccomp_data to force
		 * a reload of all registers. This does not goto skip since
		 * a skip would have already been reported.
		 */
		if (__seccomp_filter(this_syscall, NULL, true))
			return -1;

and the next seccomp_run_filters() can return SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF, right?
seccomp_do_user_notification() doesn't check recheck_after_trace and it simply
does n.data = sd.

Doesn't this mean that "unotif.data = *(knotif->data)" can hit NULL ?

seccomp_run_filters() does populate_seccomp_data() in this case, but this
won't affect "seccomp_data *sd" passed to seccomp_do_user_notification().

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-30 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-29 22:40 [PATCH v8 0/2] seccomp trap to userspace Tycho Andersen
2018-10-29 22:40 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] seccomp: add a return code to " Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 14:32   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 15:32     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-01 14:48       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-01 20:33         ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-02 11:29           ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-02 13:50             ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 15:02   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2018-10-30 15:54     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 15:54       ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 16:27       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 16:39         ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 17:21           ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 21:32             ` Kees Cook
2018-10-31 13:04               ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 21:38       ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 21:49   ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 21:54     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 22:00       ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 22:32         ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 22:34           ` Kees Cook
2018-10-31  0:29             ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-31  1:29               ` Kees Cook
2018-11-01 13:40   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-01 19:56     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-02 10:02       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-02 13:38         ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-01 13:56   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-01 19:58     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-29 23:08   ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-30 10:17     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-29 22:40 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] samples: add an example of seccomp user trap Tycho Andersen
2018-10-29 23:31   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-10-30  2:05     ` Tycho Andersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181030150254.GB3385@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=asarai@suse.de \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
    --cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.