From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heikki Krogerus Subject: [PATCH 3/4] of/property: Introduce of_fwnode_name() Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:17:26 +0300 Message-ID: <20181105091727.25544-4-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> References: <20181105091727.25544-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181105091727.25544-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Mika Westerberg , Andy Shevchenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Instead of always being forced to read the "name" property in fwnode_name() with of_nodes, implementing the fwnode operation meant for getting the node name. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus Cc: Rob Herring --- drivers/of/property.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c index f46828e3b082..ac7b0b6c2d4d 100644 --- a/drivers/of/property.c +++ b/drivers/of/property.c @@ -823,6 +823,11 @@ static void of_fwnode_put(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) of_node_put(to_of_node(fwnode)); } +static const char *of_fwnode_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) +{ + return to_of_node(fwnode)->name; +} + static bool of_fwnode_device_is_available(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) { return of_device_is_available(to_of_node(fwnode)); @@ -987,6 +992,7 @@ of_fwnode_device_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const struct fwnode_operations of_fwnode_ops = { .get = of_fwnode_get, .put = of_fwnode_put, + .name = of_fwnode_name, .device_is_available = of_fwnode_device_is_available, .device_get_match_data = of_fwnode_device_get_match_data, .property_present = of_fwnode_property_present, -- 2.19.1