From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DC0C46475 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6BF204FD for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:31:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DA6BF204FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387603AbeKFCwi (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:52:38 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:17322 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729800AbeKFCwi (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:52:38 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2018 09:31:56 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,468,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="271542995" Received: from wenjiewa-mobl2.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.249.254.60]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2018 09:31:45 -0800 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 19:31:44 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Jethro Beekman Cc: "x86@kernel.org" , "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" , "dave.hansen@intel.com" , "sean.j.christopherson@intel.com" , "nhorman@redhat.com" , "npmccallum@redhat.com" , "serge.ayoun@intel.com" , "shay.katz-zamir@intel.com" , "haitao.huang@intel.com" , "mark.shanahan@intel.com" , "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" , Suresh Siddha , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Reinette Chatre , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 16/23] x86/sgx: Enumerate and track EPC sections Message-ID: <20181105173144.GE4502@linux.intel.com> References: <20181102231320.29164-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181102231320.29164-17-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <79867568-c21f-8a09-d06e-360b1b925dd5@fortanix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79867568-c21f-8a09-d06e-360b1b925dd5@fortanix.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 01:07:27AM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote: > > + for (i = 0; i < SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS; i++) { > > Perhaps print a warning if there are more than SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS sections > reported by CPUID. Makes sense. I'll add it. /Jarkko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:17322 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729800AbeKFCwi (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:52:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 19:31:44 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Jethro Beekman CC: "x86@kernel.org" , "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" , "dave.hansen@intel.com" , "sean.j.christopherson@intel.com" , "nhorman@redhat.com" , "npmccallum@redhat.com" , "serge.ayoun@intel.com" , "shay.katz-zamir@intel.com" , "haitao.huang@intel.com" , "mark.shanahan@intel.com" , "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" , Suresh Siddha , Thomas Gleixner , "Ingo Molnar" , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Reinette Chatre , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 16/23] x86/sgx: Enumerate and track EPC sections Message-ID: <20181105173144.GE4502@linux.intel.com> References: <20181102231320.29164-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181102231320.29164-17-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <79867568-c21f-8a09-d06e-360b1b925dd5@fortanix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <79867568-c21f-8a09-d06e-360b1b925dd5@fortanix.com> Sender: List-ID: Return-Path: linux-sgx-owner@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 01:07:27AM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote: > > + for (i = 0; i < SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS; i++) { > > Perhaps print a warning if there are more than SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS sections > reported by CPUID. Makes sense. I'll add it. /Jarkko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 16/23] x86/sgx: Enumerate and track EPC sections Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 19:31:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20181105173144.GE4502@linux.intel.com> References: <20181102231320.29164-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181102231320.29164-17-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <79867568-c21f-8a09-d06e-360b1b925dd5@fortanix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79867568-c21f-8a09-d06e-360b1b925dd5@fortanix.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jethro Beekman Cc: "x86@kernel.org" , "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" , "dave.hansen@intel.com" , "sean.j.christopherson@intel.com" , "nhorman@redhat.com" , "npmccallum@redhat.com" , "serge.ayoun@intel.com" , "shay.katz-zamir@intel.com" , "haitao.huang@intel.com" , "mark.shanahan@intel.com" , "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" , Suresh Siddha , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 01:07:27AM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote: > > + for (i = 0; i < SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS; i++) { > > Perhaps print a warning if there are more than SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS sections > reported by CPUID. Makes sense. I'll add it. /Jarkko