From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: merge -fdata-sections BSS data to .bss section
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:45:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181106144554.GF30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9LmzbB=LbmdRS+GfAJOzQRTj20TcbJ=XY2jypZLSTbwQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:39:58PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 6 November 2018 at 15:29, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:13:07PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 6 November 2018 at 15:10, Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:08:06PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> >> On 6 November 2018 at 14:40, Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> >> >> > When building with -fdata-sections, the BSS data is placed into separate
> >> >> > sections, so we need to ask the linker to group these together into the
> >> >> > .bss output section, so that they're correctly placed.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> > arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S | 2 +-
> >> >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
> >> >> > index 2b963d8e76dd..3b91bc3c606f 100644
> >> >> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
> >> >> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
> >> >> > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ SECTIONS
> >> >> >
> >> >> > . = BSS_START;
> >> >> > __bss_start = .;
> >> >> > - .bss : { *(.bss) }
> >> >> > + .bss : { *(.bss) *(.bss.*) }
> >> >>
> >> >> Would it make sense to sort these by alignment? Otherwise, I suspect
> >> >> you may get a lot of padding holes due to the number of different
> >> >> input sections, each with its own alignment.
> >> >
> >> > We don't bother elsewhere in the kernel linker script - do you have
> >> > a case where we get lots of padding?
> >> >
> >>
> >> With -fdata-sections? How else are we ensuring that each .bss item in
> >> its own section is not placed such that its alignment results in a
> >> padding hole?
> >
> > Quite simply, we don't care (at the moment). The alignment does not
> > come from the size of each individual section, but the alignment
> > requirements of data within the section.
> >
> > See include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h and the definition of *_MAIN
> > symbols from around line 60.
> >
>
> This seems like an oversight to me: consider something like*
>
> unsigned char bar = 1;
> unsigned long long foo = 4;
>
> build it with
>
> arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -fdata-sections -o /tmp/foo.o -c /tmp/foo.c
>
> and we end up with the following object file
>
> Section Headers:
> [Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al
> [ 0] NULL 00000000 000000 000000 00 0 0 0
> [ 1] .text PROGBITS 00000000 000034 000000 00 AX 0 0 1
> [ 2] .data PROGBITS 00000000 000034 000000 00 WA 0 0 1
> [ 3] .bss NOBITS 00000000 000034 000000 00 WA 0 0 1
> [ 4] .data.bar PROGBITS 00000000 000034 000001 00 WA 0 0 1
> [ 5] .data.foo PROGBITS 00000000 000038 000008 00 WA 0 0 8
> ...
>
> Symbol table '.symtab' contains 13 entries:
> Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
> 11: 00000000 8 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 5 foo
> 12: 00000000 1 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 4 bar
>
> whereas if I remove the -fdata-sections argument, I get
>
> Section Headers:
> [Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al
> [ 0] NULL 00000000 000000 000000 00 0 0 0
> [ 1] .text PROGBITS 00000000 000034 000000 00 AX 0 0 1
> [ 2] .data PROGBITS 00000000 000038 000009 00 WA 0 0 8
> [ 3] .bss NOBITS 00000000 000041 000000 00 WA 0 0 1
> ...
>
> and
>
> Symbol table '.symtab' contains 11 entries:
> Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
> ...
> 9: 00000000 8 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 2 foo
> 10: 00000008 1 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 2 bar
>
> In other words, we end up with a 7 byte padding hole by switching to
> -fdata-sections, unless we sort the input objects by alignment.
>
> * for my test compiile, -fdata-sections would not produce different
> input section so I am using .data for this example.
Nevertheless, changing this is not a subject for a patch series that
targets ARM. What you've identified is a deficiency in the generic
cross-arch support for this which needs a wider audience to be
involved.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-06 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-06 13:39 [PATCH 0/4] Enable deadcode elimination at link time Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-06 13:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-06 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] EFI stub: remove -fdata-sections Russell King
2018-11-06 13:40 ` Russell King
2018-11-06 14:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06 14:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06 14:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-06 14:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-06 14:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06 14:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06 13:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mark critical data with KEEP() Russell King
2018-11-06 13:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: merge -fdata-sections BSS data to .bss section Russell King
2018-11-06 14:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06 14:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-06 14:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06 14:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-06 14:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06 14:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2018-11-06 15:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-06 16:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-06 13:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: enable LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181106144554.GF30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.