From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF4CECDE47 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D7820827 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:15:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 70D7820827 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727158AbeKHXul (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:50:41 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39156 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726710AbeKHXul (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:50:41 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46B4B3C2CD8; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-120-200.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.200]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA515D9CD; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:14:57 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Wang Cc: Tiwei Bie , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, wexu@redhat.com, jfreimann@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] virtio_ring: add packed ring support Message-ID: <20181108091337-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180711022711.7090-1-tiwei.bie@intel.com> <20180711022711.7090-4-tiwei.bie@intel.com> <20181107123933-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20181108013759.GA20591@debian> <2d46a41e-bc00-276a-e19a-105c9dffc75a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2d46a41e-bc00-276a-e19a-105c9dffc75a@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Thu, 08 Nov 2018 14:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:18:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/8 上午9:38, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > + > > > > + if (vq->vq.num_free < descs_used) { > > > > + pr_debug("Can't add buf len %i - avail = %i\n", > > > > + descs_used, vq->vq.num_free); > > > > + /* FIXME: for historical reasons, we force a notify here if > > > > + * there are outgoing parts to the buffer. Presumably the > > > > + * host should service the ring ASAP. */ > > > I don't think we have a reason to do this for packed ring. > > > No historical baggage there, right? > > Based on the original commit log, it seems that the notify here > > is just an "optimization". But I don't quite understand what does > > the "the heuristics which KVM uses" refer to. If it's safe to drop > > this in packed ring, I'd like to do it. > > > According to the commit log, it seems like a workaround of lguest networking > backend. I agree to drop it, we should not have such burden. > > But we should notice that, with this removed, the compare between packed vs > split is kind of unfair. I don't think this ever triggers to be frank. When would it? > Consider the removal of lguest support recently, > maybe we can drop this for split ring as well? > > Thanks If it's helpful, then for sure we can drop it for virtio 1. Can you see any perf differences at all? With which device? > > > > > commit 44653eae1407f79dff6f52fcf594ae84cb165ec4 > > Author: Rusty Russell > > Date: Fri Jul 25 12:06:04 2008 -0500 > > > > virtio: don't always force a notification when ring is full > > We force notification when the ring is full, even if the host has > > indicated it doesn't want to know. This seemed like a good idea at > > the time: if we fill the transmit ring, we should tell the host > > immediately. > > Unfortunately this logic also applies to the receiving ring, which is > > refilled constantly. We should introduce real notification thesholds > > to replace this logic. Meanwhile, removing the logic altogether breaks > > the heuristics which KVM uses, so we use a hack: only notify if there are > > outgoing parts of the new buffer. > > Here are the number of exits with lguest's crappy network implementation: > > Before: > > network xmit 7859051 recv 236420 > > After: > > network xmit 7858610 recv 118136 > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > index 72bf8bc09014..21d9a62767af 100644 > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > @@ -87,8 +87,11 @@ static int vring_add_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq, > > if (vq->num_free < out + in) { > > pr_debug("Can't add buf len %i - avail = %i\n", > > out + in, vq->num_free); > > - /* We notify*even if* VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY is set here. */ > > - vq->notify(&vq->vq); > > + /* FIXME: for historical reasons, we force a notify here if > > + * there are outgoing parts to the buffer. Presumably the > > + * host should service the ring ASAP. */ > > + if (out) > > + vq->notify(&vq->vq); > > END_USE(vq); > > return -ENOSPC; > > } > > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: virtio-dev-return-4943-cohuck=redhat.com@lists.oasis-open.org Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3441F985DA1 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:14:57 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20181108091337-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180711022711.7090-1-tiwei.bie@intel.com> <20180711022711.7090-4-tiwei.bie@intel.com> <20181107123933-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20181108013759.GA20591@debian> <2d46a41e-bc00-276a-e19a-105c9dffc75a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2d46a41e-bc00-276a-e19a-105c9dffc75a@redhat.com> Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] virtio_ring: add packed ring support To: Jason Wang Cc: Tiwei Bie , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, wexu@redhat.com, jfreimann@redhat.com List-ID: On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:18:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/8 上午9:38, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > + > > > > + if (vq->vq.num_free < descs_used) { > > > > + pr_debug("Can't add buf len %i - avail = %i\n", > > > > + descs_used, vq->vq.num_free); > > > > + /* FIXME: for historical reasons, we force a notify here if > > > > + * there are outgoing parts to the buffer. Presumably the > > > > + * host should service the ring ASAP. */ > > > I don't think we have a reason to do this for packed ring. > > > No historical baggage there, right? > > Based on the original commit log, it seems that the notify here > > is just an "optimization". But I don't quite understand what does > > the "the heuristics which KVM uses" refer to. If it's safe to drop > > this in packed ring, I'd like to do it. > > > According to the commit log, it seems like a workaround of lguest networking > backend. I agree to drop it, we should not have such burden. > > But we should notice that, with this removed, the compare between packed vs > split is kind of unfair. I don't think this ever triggers to be frank. When would it? > Consider the removal of lguest support recently, > maybe we can drop this for split ring as well? > > Thanks If it's helpful, then for sure we can drop it for virtio 1. Can you see any perf differences at all? With which device? > > > > > commit 44653eae1407f79dff6f52fcf594ae84cb165ec4 > > Author: Rusty Russell > > Date: Fri Jul 25 12:06:04 2008 -0500 > > > > virtio: don't always force a notification when ring is full > > We force notification when the ring is full, even if the host has > > indicated it doesn't want to know. This seemed like a good idea at > > the time: if we fill the transmit ring, we should tell the host > > immediately. > > Unfortunately this logic also applies to the receiving ring, which is > > refilled constantly. We should introduce real notification thesholds > > to replace this logic. Meanwhile, removing the logic altogether breaks > > the heuristics which KVM uses, so we use a hack: only notify if there are > > outgoing parts of the new buffer. > > Here are the number of exits with lguest's crappy network implementation: > > Before: > > network xmit 7859051 recv 236420 > > After: > > network xmit 7858610 recv 118136 > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > index 72bf8bc09014..21d9a62767af 100644 > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > @@ -87,8 +87,11 @@ static int vring_add_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq, > > if (vq->num_free < out + in) { > > pr_debug("Can't add buf len %i - avail = %i\n", > > out + in, vq->num_free); > > - /* We notify*even if* VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY is set here. */ > > - vq->notify(&vq->vq); > > + /* FIXME: for historical reasons, we force a notify here if > > + * there are outgoing parts to the buffer. Presumably the > > + * host should service the ring ASAP. */ > > + if (out) > > + vq->notify(&vq->vq); > > END_USE(vq); > > return -ENOSPC; > > } > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org